Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Practices

Past-life regression

Therapeutic Practices

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1952 to 1980

Hypnotic or guided-imagery work in which a person is led back through their own life and then, at the practitioner's suggestion, past its beginning, producing narrative material presented as memory of an earlier existence. Practitioners hold that unresolved experience from a previous life can produce symptoms in this one, and that recovering and working through it relieves them; sessions are conducted in a relaxed state with the practitioner asking directive questions about what the subject sees. The framework assumes rebirth, but the therapy is not the property of the traditions that teach rebirth, and neither Hindu nor Buddhist accounts of it underwrite the procedure. Clients frequently describe the sessions as vivid and as personally significant. Whether the material is memory is a different question from whether the session was worth having, and practitioners themselves differ over how much weight to put on the first.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
The framework assumes rebirth, but past-life regression is not the property of the traditions that teach rebirth, since neither Hindu nor Buddhist accounts of rebirth underwrite the procedure. 1
Standing as a Comparative Category
Used, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed 3
Scholarly Standing DetailSourced to the subject's own account
A 2006 survey of doctoral level mental health professionals rated "past lives" therapy as certainly discredited, one measure of the practice's standing among mainstream psychology and medicine, which regards it as unscientific rather than as an open clinical question. 2
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 1
Origins
Origin Period
1952 to 1980 1
Place of OriginSourced to the subject's own account
The United States. The hypnotic technique is credited to the Pennsylvania hypnotherapist A. R. Martin, who published Researches in Reincarnation and Beyond in 1942, and the practice reached wide public attention through the 1952 Bridey Murphy case, in which a Pueblo, Colorado housewife's hypnotic sessions were later published as The Search for Bridey Murphy. 2
Attributions
Tradition
Practiced within the New Age movement and by some hypnotherapists, drawing loosely on ideas of reincarnation found in Hinduism, Buddhism and Spiritism. 1
Practice
Who Performs It
Trained or authorised specialists 1
Frequency
As the occasion requires 1
Solitary or Communal
Performed by an officiant for a recipient 1
Controversy
Point in Dispute
The framework assumes rebirth, but neither Hindu nor Buddhist accounts of rebirth underwrite the procedure itself; practitioners of past-life regression are not drawing on those traditions' own methods, and adherents of both have objected to the borrowing of the concept without the doctrinal and ethical structure that accompanies it in its source religions. 1
Learn More
Recovering Supposed Former Lives

Past-life regression is a technique, associated with some New Age and alternative-therapy settings, in which a person is guided, usually under hypnosis or deep relaxation, to recall what are presented as memories of previous incarnations, on the assumption that the soul has lived before and that the residue of those lives can be accessed and may explain present-day fears, relationships and afflictions. Practitioners lead the subject back in imagination beyond their birth into scenes and identities interpreted as former lifetimes, and some offer the practice as a therapy, holding that reliving and resolving the traumas of a past life can heal problems in the present. The practice presupposes the doctrine of reincarnation, which is central to several major religious traditions, though those traditions themselves do not generally endorse the hypnotic recovery of past lives as it is practised in the modern therapeutic setting.

The scientific assessment of past-life regression is decidedly negative. The "memories" produced are readily explained as constructions of the imagination, assembled from the subject's own knowledge, expectations and the suggestions of the hypnotist, and hypnosis is well known to be capable of generating vivid but false memories rather than recovering true ones. Investigated cases have repeatedly turned out to draw, unconsciously, on information the subject had encountered in ordinary life, and no past-life recollection has been verified against independent evidence in a way that withstands scrutiny. Psychologists warn, moreover, that the technique can be harmful, since it can implant false memories, including false memories of trauma, with real psychological consequences. Past-life regression thus stands, from a scientific standpoint, as an unsupported practice whose vivid experiences are best understood as products of suggestion and imagination, whatever meaning its practitioners find in them.

The Bridey Murphy Case

Past-life regression entered American popular culture through a single well-documented case that also supplied its most durable scientific counterargument. In 1952, Colorado hypnotist Morey Bernstein regressed a Pueblo, Colorado housewife named Virginia Tighe across six sessions, during which she spoke in an Irish-accented voice as Bridey Murphy, a nineteenth-century Irish woman, supplying names, places and period details that Bernstein's 1956 book The Search for Bridey Murphy presented as evidence of survived memory from an actual past life, and the book became a bestseller that made past-life regression a household phrase almost overnight.

Newspaper investigation that followed the book's success traced a much more mundane source: Tighe had grown up in Chicago partly in the household of an Irish immigrant neighbour named Bridie Murphy Corkell, and researchers argued the regression had surfaced ordinary childhood memory, dramatised and elaborated under hypnosis, rather than any prior existence, a phenomenon psychologists later named cryptomnesia, the resurfacing of forgotten ordinary memory experienced by the person as new or externally sourced information. The case established the pattern nearly every subsequent regression case has followed: a session under hypnosis produces vivid, internally consistent and often historically detailed material, and subsequent research turns up an available, unremarkable source, a book once read, a film once seen, a person once known, that plausibly accounts for the content without requiring an actual past life, a pattern regression practitioners generally do not dispute has occurred in specific documented cases while maintaining that it does not account for every session they conduct.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Related To

Auditing addresses incidents held to be recorded from previous lifetimes, which is the same claim past-life regression makes in a therapeutic register.

Sources
1. New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought
Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Brill, 1996View the Source
2. Past Life Regression (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on the practice's origin in 1940s American hypnotherapy and the 1952 Bridey Murphy case, and on the 2006 professional survey rating past-life therapy as discreditedView the Source
3. Multiple Identities and False Memories: A Sociocognitive Perspective
Nicholas P. Spanos, American Psychological Association, 1996On hypnotically elicited past-life identities tracking the hypnotist's expectations
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
A History of Hypnotism
Alan Gauld, Cambridge University Press, 1992On the development of hypnotic technique and on the reliability of hypnotically refreshed recall
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.