Religious Events
The Mexican Inquisition
Persecution
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Juan de Zumarraga, first bishop of Mexico, exercised inquisitorial powers in New Spain from 1535, an early episcopal phase that ran to 1543 and prosecuted both Spanish colonists for moral and doctrinal offenses and indigenous Nahua religious specialists for continuing pre-conquest practice, its most severe case the 1539 trial and burning of the Nahua lord Carlos Ometochtzin of Texcoco. A formal Holy Office tribunal, independent of the local bishop and answering directly to the crown, was established in 1571 under first inquisitor Pedro Moya de Contreras and operated into the early nineteenth century. Unlike Zumarraga's earlier episcopal proceedings, the formal tribunal exercised no jurisdiction over Indians except for printed material in indigenous languages, indigenous religious matters instead being handled through separate diocesan and mendicant-order channels.
Facts
The Event
When It HappenedEpiscopal phase under Zumarraga, 1535 to 1543; formal Holy Office tribunal established 1571, operating into the early nineteenth century. 1 PeriodSourced to the subject's own account Principal PartiesSourced to the subject's own accountJuan de Zumarraga, first bishop of Mexico, who exercised the early episcopal inquisitorial power and presided over the 1539 trial of Carlos Ometochtzin; Pedro Moya de Contreras, the first inquisitor of the formal 1571 tribunal. 2 Victim GroupSourced to the subject's own accountIn the early episcopal phase, Nahua religious specialists and lords accused of continuing pre-conquest worship, alongside Spanish colonists prosecuted for blasphemy, bigamy and other moral or doctrinal offenses. After the formal tribunal's 1571 establishment and the exemption of Indians from its jurisdiction, its targets were chiefly Spanish and Creole colonists, crypto-Jewish New Christians who had emigrated to New Spain, and, in later centuries, individuals suspected of Protestant sympathy or Enlightenment heterodoxy. 2 Perpetrator RegimeSourced to the subject's own accountIn its early phase, the office of the bishop of Mexico under Zumarraga, exercising inquisitorial authority as an ordinary episcopal power rather than under a dedicated tribunal. From 1571, the formal Holy Office of the Inquisition in New Spain, a crown institution answering directly to the Council of the Supreme Inquisition in Spain rather than to the local church hierarchy. 2 Status
Official RecognitionSourced to the subject's own accountNot formally recognized by any body 2 Recognition BasisSourced to the subject's own accountNo state or international body has issued a genocide or crimes-against-humanity determination specific to the Mexican Inquisition; the 1539 Ometochtzin case is documented in Mexican historiography as a caution against overreach, and the wider institution addressed only within the general 1998 Vatican symposium and 2000 apology on the Inquisition as a family, without a Mexico-specific finding. 2 Legal StatusSourced to the subject's own accountFrom the formal tribunal's 1571 establishment, indigenous peoples were excluded from its jurisdiction, except for printed material in indigenous languages; the exemption is attributed to the impracticality of enforcement where native peoples vastly outnumbered European colonists, to native religious forms often being read as running parallel to Christian ones rather than opposed, and to mendicant friars frequently shielding indigenous communities from secular prosecution. Indigenous religious oversight continued instead through separate diocesan and mendicant-order channels rather than the Holy Office. 2 Consequences
What It SettledSourced to the subject's own accountThe severity of the Ometochtzin case contributed to a shift away from subjecting indigenous peoples to formal inquisitorial jurisdiction, an exemption written into the 1571 tribunal's own charter and maintained for the remainder of its operation. The formal tribunal continued into the early nineteenth century, prosecuting a colonial population of Spanish, Creole and immigrant background rather than the indigenous majority. 2 Origins
Defining MomentThe 1539 trial and public burning of Carlos Ometochtzin, Don Carlos of Texcoco, a Nahua lord Zumarraga convicted of reverting to worship of the old gods; testimony came chiefly from indigenous witnesses, and the severity of the sentence drew criticism from fellow Spanish authorities, contributing to a formal reprimand of Zumarraga and standing as the case most often cited to mark the practical limit of extending inquisitorial jurisdiction over indigenous subjects. 1 Disputed
Death TollSourced to the subject's own accountOne scholar's estimate of executions carried out by the formal 1571 to 1820 tribunal, distinct from the earlier episcopal phase's own Ometochtzin case recorded separately above; the surviving colonial record is incomplete, and no source consulted offers a firmer range, so the figure is recorded as debated rather than as a settled total. In Other Languages (6 names)
- Mexicanske inkvisition
- Inquisición en Nueva España
- Inquisition mexicaine
- Inkuisisi Meksiko
- Inquisizione messicana
- Mexicaanse inquisitie
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The targeted tradition in the tribunal's early episcopal phase: Carlos Ometochtzin and other Nahua religious specialists were prosecuted for continuing its pre-conquest practice. This is a victim-side association, not a claim that the tribunal held or endorsed the tradition.
Mexico, Countries The colonial territory where both the episcopal and formal phases of the tribunal operated.
The enforcing tradition, exercised through both the local bishop's episcopal authority and the later crown-appointed Holy Office; not a perpetrator-tradition edge, since the perpetrator was the colonial church and crown institution itself.
Related To
The Mexican Inquisition, in both its episcopal and formal phases, is part of the same wider family of Catholic ecclesiastical tribunals against heresy the aggregate Inquisition entity covers, extended to Spain's American colonies.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.