Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Legal Instruments

The Fatwa Against Salman Rushdie

Fatwas

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1989

The 1989 ruling calling for the death of the author of The Satanic Verses and of his publishers, whose current force has been disputed since 1998 between the Iranian state and Iranian clerical bodies.

Facts
Origins
Language of Composition
Persian. 1
Origin Period
from 1989 2
Place of Origin
Tehran 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Supreme Leader of Iran, issuing in his own capacity rather than through any collective clerical body. 1
Disputed
Repeal Status
Contested. The Iranian government stated in September 1998 that it had no intention of threatening the author's life; it did not claim to revoke the ruling, and Iranian clerical bodies hold that a ruling of this kind cannot be rescinded after its issuer's death. 1
The Event
When It Happened
14 February 1989, announced on Radio Tehran. 1
Learn More
The Ruling and Its Reach

The Satanic Verses was published in the United Kingdom in September 1988. Protest began in India, which banned its import within weeks, and spread through Britain, where copies were burned in Bradford in January 1989, and to Pakistan, where police fired on a demonstration in Islamabad on 12 February and several people were killed. The ruling was broadcast on Iranian radio the following day and dated 14 February 1989.

It is short. It informs the Muslims of the world that the author of the book, and those involved in its publication who were aware of its contents, are condemned to death, and calls on Muslims to execute them wherever they are found so that no one will dare to insult the sanctities of Islam again. A separate announcement by an Iranian foundation attached a monetary reward, which was raised more than once in later years.

Two features distinguish it from an ordinary fatwa. A fatwa is a legal opinion answering a question, and this was issued unprompted. And its claimed jurisdiction is universal: it addresses Muslims everywhere, over a book published in another state by a citizen of that state. Scholars of Islamic law both inside and outside Iran disputed at the time whether it satisfied the conditions for a ruling of this kind at all, among them that the accused be tried and be given opportunity to answer. Those objections were made publicly and did not affect its practical operation.

What Happened, and What Is Unsettled

The consequences fell hardest on people other than the author. Hitoshi Igarashi, who translated the novel into Japanese, was murdered at his university in 1991. Ettore Capriolo, its Italian translator, was stabbed in Milan the same year and survived. William Nygaard, its Norwegian publisher, was shot outside his home in Oslo in 1993 and survived. In July 1993 an arson attack on a hotel in Sivas in Turkey, where the novel's Turkish translator was attending a cultural festival, killed thirty-seven people; the translator escaped. Bookshops in Britain and the United States were bombed. The author lived under police protection for a decade.

The legal question is whether the ruling stands. In September 1998, as part of a settlement of diplomatic relations with the United Kingdom, the Iranian government stated that it had no intention of threatening the author's life and would not encourage anyone to do so. That is a statement of state policy. It is not a revocation of the ruling, and the Iranian government did not claim that it was. Clerical bodies in Iran, and the foundation that had offered the reward, took the position that a ruling of this kind cannot be rescinded after the death of the jurist who gave it, and the reward has been publicly reaffirmed since.

In August 2022 the author was attacked on stage in New York State and severely injured, losing the sight of one eye.

The atlas records the status as contested. It does not decide it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Critiqued Here

Hanafi School, Schools of Religious Law

Sunni jurists across the schools questioned both the authority claimed for the 1989 ruling and its reach beyond the jurisdiction that issued it.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)
Hanbali School, Schools of Religious Law

Sunni jurists across the schools questioned both the authority claimed for the 1989 ruling and its reach beyond the jurisdiction that issued it.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)
Maliki School, Schools of Religious Law

Sunni jurists across the schools questioned both the authority claimed for the 1989 ruling and its reach beyond the jurisdiction that issued it.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)
Shafii School, Schools of Religious Law

Sunni jurists across the schools questioned both the authority claimed for the 1989 ruling and its reach beyond the jurisdiction that issued it.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)
Sunni, Denominations

Sunni authorities answered that no jurist has jurisdiction over a person outside his own following and that no sentence of death can be pronounced without a court, so the ruling was widely refused even by those who condemned the book.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Element Of

The 1989 ruling issued from a Twelver source of emulation, and Twelver jurists have differed since over its standing and over whether a successor may lift it.

Source Freedom of Religion, Apostasy and IslamAbdullah Saeed and Hassan Saeed
Shia (Twelver), Denominations

The ruling was issued by the leading Iranian authority of the day, and a fatwa binds those who follow the jurist who gives it rather than the school as a whole.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)
Sources
1. From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and Its Legacy
Kenan Malik, Atlantic Books, 2009
2. The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West
Daniel Pipes, Birch Lane Press, 1990
Open Questions (1 open question)
Is the ruling of 14 February 1989 in force today, and by what test would that be decided?

The Iranian government stated in September 1998 that it had no intention of threatening the author's life and would not encourage anyone to do so. It did not describe that as a revocation. Iranian clerical bodies and the foundation that offered a reward have held that a ruling of this kind cannot be withdrawn after the death of the jurist who issued it, and the reward has been publicly reaffirmed since. The two positions are held by different institutions in the same state and neither has been withdrawn.

What would resolve this A published juristic analysis, from within the school concerned, of whether a ruling of this kind survives its issuer and what act would be required to end it. A clear statement from the authority claiming successor jurisdiction would settle the practical half.
Islamic jurisprudence, Twelver Shia; contemporary Iranian legal and political historyKenan Malik, From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and Its Legacy
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.