Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Roles & Titles

Chaplain

Christianity Roles

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A chaplain serves an institution rather than a congregation, an army, a hospital, a prison, a university, a ship, a legislature. The distinguishing feature of the office is that the chaplain is placed among people who did not choose the chaplain and mostly do not share the chaplain's faith, and is expected to serve all of them. That produces the working rule of the role: a chaplain arranges for the rites of traditions not their own, and is judged professionally on how well they do it.

Chaplains are endorsed by their own religious body and appointed by the institution, so authority is doubled and can conflict. Military chaplains are commissioned officers in most armed forces and are non-combatants under the Geneva Conventions. Healthcare chaplaincy has professionalised into a certified discipline with clinical training requirements. The office is no longer Christian by definition: Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, pagan and humanist chaplains are endorsed and appointed in armed forces and health services in several countries, and the arguments over which bodies may endorse chaplains are among the more practical church-state disputes now running.

Facts
Organisation
Reach of Its Authority
One congregation, house or temple 1
Authority Scope Detail
Serves an institution, not a congregation of their own faith 1
Attributions
Tradition
Christianity and beyond 1
Associated Religion
Christianity 1
Status
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 1
Learn More
Serving People Who Did Not Choose You

Every other office in this atlas serves a community that shares its faith. The chaplain does not, and the whole shape of the role follows from that.

A chaplain is placed in an institution, a regiment, a hospital, a prison, a ship, a university, among people who are there for reasons unconnected to religion, most of whom do not share the chaplain's own. The working expectation is that the chaplain serves all of them. In practice this means finding a priest for a dying Catholic when the chaplain is a Baptist, arranging halal provision, knowing which rites must be performed within hours of death and by whom, and sitting with people who want none of it.

The structural oddity is doubled authority. A chaplain is endorsed by a religious body and appointed by a secular institution, and the two can pull in different directions, over what may be said, over confidentiality, over whether the chaplain is present as a minister or as an officer. Military chaplains are commissioned in most armed forces and are non-combatants under the Geneva Conventions, which is a specific legal status and not a courtesy.

The office is no longer Christian by definition. Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, pagan and humanist chaplains are endorsed and appointed in armed forces and health services in a number of countries. The resulting arguments, which bodies may endorse, whether a humanist can be a chaplain at all, whether public money should fund any of it, are among the more practical church-and-state disputes now running, and they are being decided institution by institution rather than by any general principle.

A Medieval Royal Office Becomes a Licensed Profession

The word chaplain descends from the cappa, the cloak of Saint Martin of Tours kept as a relic, and its earliest holders were clergy who guarded that relic for the Frankish kings and then, by extension, any priest attached to a royal or noble household or its private chapel rather than to a parish. Military chaplaincy grew from the same root, clergy who accompanied medieval armies, and hospital and prison chaplaincy developed later as those institutions themselves became organised and permanent.

The office professionalised substantially in the twentieth century, particularly in healthcare, where chaplains in the United States and several other countries now typically complete supervised clinical pastoral education and hold board certification through bodies that set standards regardless of the chaplain's denomination. Recognition of chaplains outside the Christian traditions has followed unevenly: several national health services and university systems now employ Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu chaplains alongside Christian ones, while the question of humanist and secular chaplains, who offer the same pastoral presence without any religious content, remains actively contested, with some prisons, universities and health systems in the United Kingdom and the United States recognising the role and the United States military notably slower to do so.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Related To

Chaplaincy, Practices
Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005s.v. ChaplainView the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005On pastoral ministry and the office of the chaplainView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.