Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Rune Aetts

Heimdall's Aett

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 400

The second family of eight runes (Hagalaz to Sowilo), named for the watchman Heimdall. It groups the second eight runes of the Elder Futhark, Hagalaz through Sowilo, the middle third of the row the Kylver Stone's dot marks separate from the aettir either side of it.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
400 1Tradition: Kylver Stone, earliest complete attestation of the futhark row
Origin Period
The three-way division of the Elder Futhark itself is attested on the Kylver Stone, Gotland, circa 400 CE, the earliest complete Futhark row and the only pre-modern source that marks the twenty four runes into blocks of eight. No rune poem or earlier inscription names or dates the division; this is the sole anchor for it. 1
Origin of the Name
The division of the Elder Futhark into three groups of eight is attested on the Kylver Stone, Gotland, circa 400 CE. Naming each group after a deity, here Heimdall, is not attested in that stone or any rune poem. It is a systematization from twentieth century rune scholarship, read back onto a genuinely ancient division. 1
Learn More
Heimdall's Aett, the Middle Eight

Heimdall's Aett is the second of the three groups of eight runes making up the Elder Futhark, covering Hagalaz, Nauthiz, Isa, Jera, Eihwaz, Perthro, Algiz and Sowilo, the middle third of the twenty four rune row as the Kylver Stone's dividing marks lay it out. Where the first aett opens on Fehu, wealth and increase, this middle group opens on Hagalaz, hail, a sign generally read across the surviving rune poem tradition as disruptive and destructive, so the row moves from an opening group weighted toward growth and social bonds into a middle group whose early runes, hail, need and ice among them, read considerably harder, before the group closes on Sowilo, the sun, one of the row's most straightforwardly favourable signs.

R. I. Page's account of the Old English rune poem, the earliest and fullest surviving commentary on individual rune meanings even though it describes the later Anglo-Saxon futhorc rather than the Elder Futhark directly, glosses Hægl as a grain that falls from the sky and troubles the world, a reading broadly consistent with how this aett's opening sign is read across the wider tradition. The middle position of this aett within the row's three part structure has invited comment from modern rune workers about a possible movement from beginning through trial to completion across the three groups, though this reading is an interpretive layer rather than anything the Kylver Stone or the early sources state.

The Heimdall Naming, Honestly Stated

The custom of naming this aett after Heimdall, the watchman god of Norse myth said in the Eddic sources to guard the approach to Asgard and to possess extraordinarily keen senses, is common in modern rune literature, sometimes explained by pointing to this aett's association with vigilance, protection and the trials of Hagalaz and Nauthiz that open it, yet as with the naming of the aett either side of it, this entry cannot trace the specific pairing of Heimdall with this particular group of eight runes to the Poetic Edda, the Prose Edda, or either surviving rune poem.

Some modern sources instead name this middle group Hagal's Aett, after its own opening rune rather than after any god at all, a naming with the advantage of staying closer to what the row itself actually shows, and the coexistence of both namings in circulation today is itself evidence that the god based scheme is a comparatively recent addition layered onto an older, purely structural division rather than an inherited part of the tradition with one settled, ancient form. What the medieval evidence supports without qualification is the row's division into three groups of eight and this group's own eight runes in their fixed order; the choice to call the group Heimdall's rather than Hagal's, or to name it for any god at all, belongs to twentieth century and later rune practice, stated here plainly rather than left for a reader to assume was always so.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Composed Of

Algiz, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Eihwaz, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Hagalaz, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Isa, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Jera, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Nauthiz, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Perthro, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes
Sowilo, Runes
Source Runes: A HandbookMichael P. Barnes

Contained In

One of the three groups of eight the row is divided into.

Sources
1. Runes: A Handbook
Michael P. Barnes, The Boydell Press, 2012View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.