Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sacred Sites

The Songlines

Aboriginal Australian Sites

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Routes across the Australian continent that follow the journeys of ancestral beings, carried in sequences of song whose verses run in the order of the places along the way. A songline is at once a law, a title, a map and a liturgy: to sing it in order is to describe the country in order, and the right to sing a stretch of it is the right to speak for that stretch of country. Tracks cross many language groups, with neighbouring peoples holding successive sections, so that no single person or group possesses a whole one and the knowledge is distributed by design. Particular songs, particular verses and the sites they name are restricted, commonly by gender and by initiation, and none of that is set out here.

Facts
Cultural Restriction
Restricted TraditionSourced to the subject's own account
Particular songs, particular verses and the sites they name along a songline are restricted, commonly by gender and by initiation, and the right to sing or reproduce a stretch of one belongs to the people and the ceremony it comes from rather than to anyone who has heard or recorded it. The atlas records that songlines exist and how they work as a form and does not set out the restricted content they carry. 2
Status
Status Today
In active religious use 1
Status Today
Access restricted by its custodians or by law 1
Much of the detail of the songlines is restricted, held by particular people, and in places gendered. This atlas records that they exist, are travelled and are law, and does not publish what is not for publication.
Attributions
Tradition
Aboriginal Australian 1
Site
Type of Site
Sacred landscape or country 1
Type of Site DetailSourced to the subject's own account
Australian Aboriginal songlines tracing ancestral beings' journeys across the continent, functioning at once as law, title, map and liturgy, distributed across many language groups. 2
Origins
Country
Australia 1
Region
Oceania and Australia 1
Learn More
Why Dreamtime Is the Wrong Word

Dreamtime is a nineteenth-century translation and a poor one, and the criticism of it is made by Aboriginal people rather than on their behalf.

The word entered English through Francis Gillen and Baldwin Spencer's work with Arrernte people in central Australia in the 1890s, rendering altyerre and cognate terms in other languages. Two things went wrong at once. The English word imports sleep and unreality, which the original does not; and the suffix -time implies a finished era, a mythic past that is over. What the term actually names is understood as a condition that is present and continuing, the ancestral order that made the country, that is still in the country, and that governs conduct now. Many communities prefer the Dreaming, and many prefer their own word and use it in English.

A songline is a route across the continent following the journey of an ancestral being, carried in a sequence of song whose verses run in the order of the places along the way. To sing it in order is to describe the country in order. This makes it simultaneously several things that European categories keep apart: a map, a title deed, a body of law, and a liturgy. The right to sing a stretch of it is the right to speak for that stretch of country, and the two cannot be separated.

The structure has a property worth stating plainly, because it explains why the knowledge is organised as it is. Tracks cross many language groups, and neighbouring peoples hold successive sections. No single person and no single group holds a whole one. The knowledge is distributed by design, which means it cannot be acquired in one place, cannot be owned outright, and cannot be transmitted by any authority acting alone.

Most of the specifics are restricted: commonly by gender, by initiation, and by relationship to particular country. That is why this entry describes the form and publishes no content: no verses, no site associations, no ancestral narratives.

English-speaking readers largely encountered the idea through Bruce Chatwin's The Songlines (1987), which is a travel book built around the author's own preoccupations and was never a source. It remains the most common route by which people acquire a confident and unreliable picture.

There is a model for doing this properly, and it is one custodians built themselves. Songlines: Tracking the Seven Sisters, developed with Anangu, Ngaanyatjarra and Yankunytjatjara communities and shown at the National Museum of Australia in 2017, presented songline material publicly with the custodians deciding what was included, what was withheld, and how it was framed. That is the standard: not what outsiders can find out, but what the holders have chosen to release.

Singing a Route Across the Land

A songline can work as a functioning map across country too vast to memorise any other way, which is part of why the practice survived without ever being written down.

Singing a route across the land

Songlines encode journeys taken by ancestral beings across the landscape, with specific features, waterholes, rock formations, ridgelines, tied to specific verses that, sung in the correct sequence, can guide a traveller across enormous distances by referencing landmarks in the order they will actually be encountered, functioning as a navigational and geographic knowledge system as much as a religious narrative.

Recognised by law, without being written down

Songlines and the country they describe have been cited as evidence in Australian native title land claims, since Australian courts have in some cases accepted continuity of traditional connection to land, demonstrated partly through such knowledge, as a basis for legal recognition. The underlying content of specific songlines, however, generally remains oral and restricted within the custodianship of the relevant community rather than transcribed for public or legal record in full.

Crossing language and country boundaries

Because songlines can run for very long distances, a single ancestral track may pass through the country and language of multiple different groups, each custodian responsible for their own section of the songline, a distributed system of shared but partitioned knowledge that requires cooperation across groups to maintain the full route rather than any single custodian holding the whole picture.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source Songlines: Tracking the Seven SistersAnangu, Ngaanyatjarra and Yankunytjatjara custodians with the National Museum of Australiathe holders' own account

Contained In

Related To

Uluru, Sacred Sites

The songline tracks pass through and connect sites of which Uluru is one. The atlas names the tracks without recounting what is sung along them, which is not open material.

Sources
1. Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness
Deborah Bird Rose, Australian Heritage Commission, 1996from the site's own catalogue record
2. Songlines: Tracking the Seven Sisters
Anangu, Ngaanyatjarra and Yankunytjatjara custodians with the National Museum of Australia, National Museum of Australia, 2017Custodian-controlled public presentationthe holders' own accountView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.