Origin from 1960
Chinese astrological systems read within their own astronomical and imperial context, given systematic scholarly treatment by Joseph Needham's history of Chinese science published as the 1950s closed. Describes astrology's role reading celestial events as verdicts on the Mandate of Heaven.
Facts
Method
Methodphilological and historical reconstruction of Chinese astrological and calendrical texts within their own astronomical and cosmological context, rather than judged against modern astronomy 2 Subject
Subjectthe historical development of Chinese astrological systems, the twenty eight lunar mansions, the ganzhi cycle and their relationship to imperial astronomy and cosmology 2 Identity
Field Category Parent Field Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline Learn More
Needham Puts Chinese Sky Watching Into a Systematic History
The history of Chinese astrology reconstructs how Chinese astrological systems, the twenty eight lunar mansions, the sexagenary ganzhi cycle and the astrology of the imperial court, developed within their own astronomical and cosmological context, reading them as part of a technically serious tradition of sky observation tied to statecraft rather than as folklore. As the 1950s came to a close, the historian of Chinese science Joseph Needham published the third volume of his Science and Civilisation in China, covering mathematics and the sciences of the heavens and the earth, giving Chinese astronomy and astrology their first systematic scholarly treatment in a Western language and establishing that Chinese court astrology was inseparable from a genuinely sophisticated observational astronomy.
Chinese astrology was, for most of its documented history, an instrument of imperial legitimacy, reading celestial events as verdicts on the ruling dynasty's Mandate of Heaven, a role quite different from the personal horoscope tradition familiar from Hellenistic astrology. Needham's scholarship gives the atlas the documented technical and political context needed to describe Chinese astrology on its own historical terms rather than assimilating it to a Western astrological framework it did not share.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Branch Of
Open Questions Needing This
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.