Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Jain Studies

Humanities

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1887

Jain scripture, doctrine and community history studied through epigraphic and manuscript evidence rather than assumed antiquity. Founded on hard evidence in 1887, when Georg Buhler used dated inscriptions from Mathura to prove Jainism an ancient tradition in its own right, distinct from Buddhism.

Facts
Method
Method
epigraphic and textual analysis of Jain inscriptions and scripture, establishing what the documented record supports about a teaching's antiquity and its Digambara or Svetambara transmission 2
Subject
Subject
Jain scripture, doctrine and community history, and what a specific Jain teaching or practice's textual basis is across the tradition's Digambara and Svetambara branches 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Religious Studies 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1887 2
Learn More
Buhler Reads the Mathura Inscriptions and Proves the Jains Are Ancient

Jain studies examines Jain scripture, doctrine and community history, establishing what a specific teaching or practice's actual textual basis is and how it is understood across the tradition's Digambara and Svetambara branches. The Austrian Indologist Georg Buhler read his essay on the Jaina sect before the Imperial Academy of Sciences of Vienna in 1887, using a large body of dedicatory inscriptions from Mathura, dated to the Indo-Scythian period, to demonstrate for the first time on hard epigraphic evidence that Jainism was a genuinely ancient tradition with its own documented monastic schools rather than a late offshoot of Buddhism, as many contemporary scholars had assumed.

Buhler's inscription based method, checking what a Jain doctrine or lineage claim is actually attested to in dated stone rather than assuming its antiquity from later tradition alone, is the standard Jain studies still applies. The atlas relies on the discipline wherever a Jain teaching's age or scriptural basis is described, and wherever the Digambara and Svetambara branches diverge in reading the same tradition, distinguishing what the epigraphic and manuscript record actually supports from either community's own retrospective account.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Mathura, Cities

This source names Mathura directly: "Buhler used dated inscriptions from Mathura to prove Jainism an ancient tradition in its own right, distinct from Buddhism."

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.