Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti is a black and white documentary built from footage the experimental filmmaker Maya Deren shot in Haiti between 1947 and 1954 on a Guggenheim fellowship, showing dance and possession during Rada and Petro Vodou services. Deren never finished editing it before her death in 1961. Twenty years later her third husband Teiji Ito and his wife Cherel Winett Ito completed the film, adapting its narration from Deren's own 1953 book, and it was released in 1981.
Facts
Subject Matter
Religious Subject MatterThe film documents public Vodou ceremonial life, the dance and spirit possession that make up Rada and Petro service, filmed as it actually occurred rather than staged. It does not depict kanzo or any other closed initiatory content. Deren herself was initiated into Vodou during the years she kept returning to Haiti; that fact is recorded here as biography about the filmmaker's access, not as a description of what her initiation involved, which remains closed knowledge held by initiates. 2 Scholarly ReceptionReviewing the film for American Anthropologist in December 1982, anthropologist George M. Epple gave it a nuanced assessment: limited usefulness for a general audience, since the footage offers little context on Haitian society or Vodou's place within it, but a thrilling visual document of Haiti for the informed viewer, footage that could not be recreated today. The film is widely treated as a respectful, primary ethnographic record precisely because Deren's own relationship with the community, culminating in her initiation, gave her access other filmmakers could not have obtained. 3 Production
Release YearSourced to the subject's own account DirectorSourced to the subject's own accountMaya Deren, completed by Teiji Ito and Cherel Winett Ito 1 Country of OriginSourced to the subject's own account FormatSourced to the subject's own account Learn More
A Filmmaker Who Was Initiated Before She Finished Filming
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Maya Deren went to Haiti in 1947 on a Guggenheim fellowship, with a stated plan to film the dancing that runs through Vodou ceremony. What happened instead took years longer and became something closer than observation. Between 1947 and 1954 she kept returning, shooting footage of Rada and Petro service, the two great families of Vodou ceremonial practice, capturing dance and possession as they actually occurred rather than staged for the camera. Her engagement with the religion deepened past the terms of her fellowship, and during her time in Haiti Deren herself was initiated into Vodou. This atlas states that fact and stops there. What her initiation involved is closed knowledge, held by initiates, and no description of its procedure belongs on a public page, whatever access it gave her.
Deren never finished editing the footage before her death in 1961. Twenty years later her third husband, Teiji Ito, and his wife Cherel Winett Ito completed the film from her materials, adapting narration from Deren's own 1953 book, Divine Horsemen: The Voodoo Gods of Haiti, published by Vanguard Press with an introduction by Joseph Campbell. The result, released in 1981 as Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti, shows public ceremonial dance and possession, the visible and communal side of Vodou practice that the religion has never treated as closed, filmed by someone the community had itself accepted far enough inside to record it.
What an Informed Viewer Sees That a General One Does Not
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Reviewing Divine Horsemen for American Anthropologist in December 1982, the anthropologist George M. Epple gave the film a mixed but careful assessment, one this atlas treats as more useful than either praise or dismissal alone. Epple judged the film to have limited usefulness for a general audience. Watched without background, it offers little explanation of who the dancers are, how Haitian society is organized, or what role Vodou plays in the wider culture, since Maya Deren's original footage was never built around the expository structure a newcomer might expect. For an informed viewer, Epple found something else entirely, a thrilling visual document of Haiti's ceremonial life, footage that could not be recreated today and that few outsiders were ever positioned to capture.
That split assessment is the honest way to hold this film. It is not a primer, and this atlas does not present it as one. It is a primary visual record, made by someone the Vodou community allowed unusually close, of dance and possession as lived practice rather than as horror set dressing, exactly the register the Wes Craven adaptation of Wade Davis's book, released the same decade, only partly reached. Placed beside each other, the two films from this period show the same religion treated two different ways by people standing in two different relationships to it.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
A documentary built from footage a filmmaker accepted into the Vodou community, and later initiated into it, shot of public ceremonial dance and possession, treated by peer reviewed scholarship as a respectful primary ethnographic record rather than as entertainment.
Sources
1. Wikipedia, "Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti"
2. Deren, Divine Horsemen: The Voodoo Gods of Haiti (book), Vanguard Press, 1953
Maya Deren, Vanguard Press, 1953The 1953 book the film's narration was adapted from
3. Epple, Review of Divine Horsemen, American Anthropologist, 1982
George M. Epple, American Anthropologist, Vol. 84, No. 4, pages 979 to 980, 1982
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.