Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scripture Portions

Noach

Also Known As NoahOriginal Term noach (Hebrew, the name Noah)
Torah

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The flood is where the Torah first tests whether divine justice and divine mercy can be held together, and the resolution is a concession: God promises never to repeat it because the human inclination is evil from youth, the same fact that had justified the destruction now argues against ever repeating it. The rainbow covenant is unilateral, demanding nothing in return, which distinguishes it from every later covenant in the Torah. From this section the rabbis derived the seven Noahide commandments, the tradition's account of what is asked of humanity at large rather than of Israel, and that construction has carried far more weight in Jewish thought about non-Jews than the narrative itself. The portion closes at Babel, where a unified humanity is scattered into languages, which is the condition the call of Abraham answers.

Facts
Reckoning
Date Rule
It is the 2nd of the fifty-four parashiyot and covers Genesis 6:9-11:32 1
Date Rule
On its appointed Sabbath in the annual Babylonian reading cycle 1
Date Rule
Read as the weekly Torah portion (parashat ha-shavua) 1
Identity
Parent Work
Torah 1
Position in the Canon
Parashah 2 1
Canonical Reference
Genesis 6:9-11:32 1
Origins
Language
Biblical Hebrew 1
Learn More
Noah: The Flood and the Covenant of the Rainbow

In the synagogue the Torah is read aloud in a fixed annual cycle of fifty-four weekly portions (parashiyot), one each Shabbat morning, with certain adjacent portions doubled in ordinary years so the sequence fits the calendar. Each portion is named for a distinctive word near its opening and is paired with a haftarah, a reading from the Prophets. The cycle closes and restarts on Simchat Torah. Noach ('Noah', Genesis 6:9-11:32) tells of the great flood, the ark that preserved life, and God's covenant sealed by the rainbow never again to destroy the earth by water. It closes with the tower of Babel and the scattering of tongues, and the line leading to Abram.

The flood narrative's two intertwined strands, one using the divine name Elohim and specifying seven pairs of clean animals against two of unclean (Genesis 7:2-3), the other using YHVH and speaking simply of pairs, is a classic text in source-critical scholarship's argument that Genesis weaves together originally separate accounts, a reading traditional commentary does not follow, preferring instead, as Rashi does, to resolve apparent tensions within a single unified narrative. Noach's covenant, sealed by the rainbow and made not with Israel alone but with 'every living creature of all flesh' (Genesis 9:15-17), grounds the rabbinic doctrine of the seven Noahide laws, prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, theft, sexual immorality, eating flesh from a living animal, and the positive duty to establish courts of justice, understood in classical rabbinic sources as the minimal ethical code binding on all humanity rather than only on Israel.

A Covenant for All Humanity

Noach is read as the story not of Israel alone but of humanity: the covenant of the rainbow is made with all living things, and rabbinic tradition derives from it the seven Noahide laws held to bind all peoples. The flood narrative has close parallels in older Mesopotamian epics such as Gilgamesh, a comparison much discussed in modern scholarship, while the tower of Babel accounts for the diversity of the world's languages.

Rabbinic literature reads the specific detail that Noah was 'righteous in his generation' (Genesis 6:9) as an ambiguous qualifier, and a debate preserved in the Talmud (Sanhedrin 108a) asks whether the phrase praises Noah for maintaining righteousness despite a corrupt age or diminishes him by suggesting he would have seemed unremarkable in a better one, a comparison drawn explicitly against Abraham, who is never so qualified. The tower of Babel's builders are read by some classical commentators, including a tradition preserved by Rashi drawing on earlier midrash, as motivated less by simple pride than by a totalitarian ambition to prevent future dispersal and enforce uniform conformity, so that the scattering of languages functions in this reading as a corrective to coerced homogeneity rather than a punishment for architectural ambition alone. Comparison with the Mesopotamian flood accounts, particularly the Epic of Gilgamesh's Utnapishtim narrative and the earlier Atrahasis epic, remains one of the most extensively studied instances of shared Ancient Near Eastern flood tradition, with modern scholarship generally reading the biblical account as engaging critically with this older material rather than composing independently of it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Fixed liturgical pairing: this haftarah is read alongside this parashah.

Source Judaism 101: Torah Readings and HaftarotTracey R. Rich

Contained In

Originates in Language

Source Jewish Liturgy: A Comprehensive HistoryIsmar Elbogen, translated by Raymond P. Scheindlin

Textual Parallel To

The Genesis flood (Noach) and the flood of the Atrahasis epic share the same narrative core: a divine decision to destroy humanity, a warned survivor, a boat, deliverance of a household and animals, and a post-flood sacrifice.

Source Atra-hasis: The Babylonian Story of the FloodW. G. Lambert and A. R. Millard

The Genesis flood (Noach) and the flood of Gilgamesh Tablet XI share the same narrative core: divine decision to destroy humanity, a warned survivor, an ark, the sending of birds, and a post-flood sacrifice.

Sources
1. Jewish Liturgy: A Comprehensive History
Ismar Elbogen, translated by Raymond P. Scheindlin, Jewish Publication Society and Jewish Theological Seminary, 1993from the parent text's own language recordView the Source
The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous (multiple authors)Genesis 6:9-11:32View the Source
Atra-hasis: The Babylonian Story of the Flood
W. G. Lambert and A. R. Millard, Oxford University Press, 1969View the Source
The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts
Andrew R. George, Oxford University Press, 2003View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.