Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Shem Angels

Aniel

AH-nee-el
Spiritual Breakthroughs

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1050 to 1105

Aniel is the 37th of the seventy-two angels of the Shem ha-Mephorash, the divided Name of God. The seventy-two names are drawn from three consecutive verses of Exodus (14:19, 14:20, 14:21), each exactly seventy-two Hebrew letters long; taking verse 19 forward, verse 20 in reverse, and verse 21 forward one letter at a time yields seventy-two three-letter roots, and to each is added the suffix -EL (God), invoking the aspect of God on the Pillar of Severity. This angel governs 0 to 5 degrees of Libra, the first decan of the sign, ruled in the Chaldean order by the Moon; in the Golden Dawn tarot this decan answers to the Two of Swords. In the traditional arrangement of the Name it belongs to the choir of the Powers under the archangel Camael (Khamael), the octad attributed to Geburah (Severity). Its sphere of influence is spiritual breakthroughs. The verse Psalm 80:3 is traditionally recited to invoke its aid.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1050 to 1105 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Origin Period
1150 to 1200 2Tradition: Sefer ha-Bahir
Origin Period
1270 to 1300 3Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah
Origin Period
1517 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Place of Origin
German Rhineland for Reuchlin's Latin treatment 5
Place of Origin
Northern France for Rashi's comment 5
Place of Origin
Provence and Languedoc for the Bahir; Castile for the Zohar 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
Derivation is Jewish and medieval; the angelology is Christian Kabbalah 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
Johann Reuchlin (1455-1522), German Hebraist, De Arte Cabalistica, 1517 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
No author for the derivation 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Rashi (d. 1105) describes the names as already marked out, not found 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Treats the seventy-two groups as angel names, adds -el/-yah suffixes 4
Origin of the Name
Constructed from Exodus 14:19-21, each verse seventy-two letters 6
Origin of the Name
Nothing in Exodus prescribes this reading 6
Origin of the Name
Read boustrophedon: forward, reversed, forward, one letter each 6
Origin of the Name
Shem ha-Mephorash first meant the Tetragrammaton, not seventy-two names 7
Origin of the Name
Talmud discusses twelve- and forty-two-letter names, not this derivation 7
Language
Biblical Hebrew 6
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Gives no angel a quality, degree span, psalm, planet or card 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Names the three adjacent verses of Beshallach, and no more 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Qualities, degrees, psalms and zodiac signs are not in his list 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Rashi's comment on Sukkah 45a is the earliest clear description 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Reuchlin's list gives the names and the two pronounceable suffixes 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 1
Derivation first attested by Rashi (d. 1105)
Learn More
Aniel, Haniel, Anael

The thirty-seventh of the seventy-two is usually printed Aniel, and it sits uncomfortably close to two other names in the same body of literature.

Haniel is one of the sephirothic archangels, assigned to Netzach in the standard Kabbalistic scheme, and appears in that role in the tables the seventy-two are set alongside. Anael is a planetary intelligence associated with Venus in the Agrippan and later magical literature, and appears widely in the grimoire tradition. All three are transliterations of Hebrew forms built on similar consonants, and English drops or renders the initial heh and the ayin inconsistently.

Whether they are one name or three is not a question the popular sources handle well. Some treat them as identical, some as related, some as distinct without comment. The determination has to be made in Hebrew, letter by letter, and the answer differs depending which source's spelling is taken as authoritative, which is itself a symptom of how the material has been transmitted.

The general lesson is more useful than the particular answer. Angelic onomastics in this literature is a field of near-collisions. A finite stock of Hebrew roots, two standard theophoric suffixes and several centuries of Latin-alphabet transmission guarantee that names will converge, and readers will find significance in the convergence.

Sometimes the convergence is real. The forty-second of the seventy-two is spelled in Hebrew exactly as the archangel Michael is spelled, and that is a genuine identity of form. Sometimes it is not: the forty-sixth is spelled with an ayin where the biblical Ariel has an aleph, so an apparent identity in English is not one in Hebrew at all.

The only way to tell them apart is to look.

The Archangel Column

Each of the nine octads of the seventy-two is assigned a governing archangel: Metatron, Raziel, Tzaphkiel, Tzadkiel, Khamael, Michael, Haniel, Raphael, Gabriel, following the sephiroth from Kether downward.

The column has a mixed pedigree and it repays unpacking.

Michael, Gabriel and Raphael are the best attested. Michael and Gabriel are named in the Book of Daniel; Raphael is named in Tobit. All three are firmly established in Jewish and Christian angelology by late antiquity.

Metatron belongs to a different stratum: the Hekhalot literature and the merkavah tradition, where he is a figure of exceptional standing, sometimes identified with the translated Enoch. The name has no convincing Hebrew etymology, and its origin has been argued over for a very long time.

Raziel is associated with the Sefer Raziel ha-Malakh, a compilation of magical and cosmological material with a complicated medieval textual history.

Tzaphkiel, Tzadkiel, Khamael and Haniel are principally known from the sephirothic scheme itself, and are attested most clearly in the Kabbalistic and later magical literature rather than in earlier sources.

So the column mixes figures from the Hebrew Bible, from the Apocrypha, from Jewish mystical literature of late antiquity, from medieval magical compilation and from Kabbalistic systematisation. The nine of them are made to line up with the nine choirs of Pseudo-Dionysius, a Greek Christian text of around 500, and with nine of the ten sephiroth.

This is the pattern throughout the apparatus around the seventy-two: a coherent final table assembled from components of widely different date and provenance, presented without any indication that they differ.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Originates in Language

Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)Anonymous (multiple authors)
Sources
1. Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Shlomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)Sukkah 45aView the Source
2. Sefer ha-Bahir (The Book of Illumination)
Anonymousthe sections working with the seventy-two-fold nameView the Source
3. The Zohar
Traditionally attributed to Moses de LeonBeshallach 52aView the Source
4. De Arte Cabalistica (On the Art of Kabbalah)
Johann Reuchlin, Abaris Books, 1517the treatment of the seventy-two three-letter groups as the names of angelsView the Source
5. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the chapters on the Bahir and on the ZoharView the Source
6. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous (multiple authors)Exodus 14:19-21View the Source
7. The Babylonian Talmud
Anonymous (multiple authors), Soncino Press, 1935Kiddushin 71aView the Source
Three Books of Occult Philosophy
Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Llewellyn, 1533Book II
Quote, Book II
Anael among the planetary intelligences of the Agrippan tradition, one of the names the thirty-seventh of the seventy-two is confused with.
View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.