Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Shem Angels

Iah-Hel

EE-ah-hel
Meditation and Inner Peace

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1050 to 1105

Iah-Hel is the 62nd of the seventy-two angels of the Shem ha-Mephorash, the divided Name of God. The seventy-two names are drawn from three consecutive verses of Exodus (14:19, 14:20, 14:21), each exactly seventy-two Hebrew letters long; taking verse 19 forward, verse 20 in reverse, and verse 21 forward one letter at a time yields seventy-two three-letter roots, and to each is added the suffix -EL (God), invoking the aspect of God on the Pillar of Severity. This angel governs 5 to 10 degrees of Aquarius, the first decan of the sign, ruled in the Chaldean order by Venus; in the Golden Dawn tarot this decan answers to the Five of Swords. In the traditional arrangement of the Name it belongs to the choir of the Archangels under the archangel Michael, the octad attributed to Hod (Splendor). Its sphere of influence is meditation and inner peace. The verse Psalm 119:159 is traditionally recited to invoke its aid.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1050 to 1105 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Origin Period
1150 to 1200 2Tradition: Sefer ha-Bahir
Origin Period
1270 to 1300 3Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah
Origin Period
1517 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Place of Origin
German Rhineland for Reuchlin's Latin treatment 5
Place of Origin
Northern France for Rashi's comment 5
Place of Origin
Provence and Languedoc for the Bahir; Castile for the Zohar 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
Derivation is Jewish and medieval; the angelology is Christian Kabbalah 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
Johann Reuchlin (1455-1522), German Hebraist, De Arte Cabalistica, 1517 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
No author for the derivation 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Rashi (d. 1105) describes the names as already marked out, not found 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Treats the seventy-two groups as angel names, adds -el/-yah suffixes 4
Origin of the Name
Constructed from Exodus 14:19-21, each verse seventy-two letters 6
Origin of the Name
Nothing in Exodus prescribes this reading 6
Origin of the Name
Read boustrophedon: forward, reversed, forward, one letter each 6
Origin of the Name
Shem ha-Mephorash first meant the Tetragrammaton, not seventy-two names 7
Origin of the Name
Talmud discusses twelve- and forty-two-letter names, not this derivation 7
Language
Biblical Hebrew 6
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Gives no angel a quality, degree span, psalm, planet or card 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Names the three adjacent verses of Beshallach, and no more 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Qualities, degrees, psalms and zodiac signs are not in his list 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Rashi's comment on Sukkah 45a is the earliest clear description 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Reuchlin's list gives the names and the two pronounceable suffixes 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 1
Derivation first attested by Rashi (d. 1105)
Learn More
The Name That Sits Oddly

Most of the seventy-two follow one shape: three consonants, then a suffix. The sixty-second, usually printed Iah-Hel or Iahhel, does not obviously conform, and its printed form has attracted more comment than most.

The difficulty is partly typographic. The hyphen is an editorial insertion with no counterpart in Hebrew, and it makes the name look like a compound of two divine elements, Yah and El, rather than a root plus suffix. Different sources print it differently, and some drop the hyphen entirely.

It is partly a matter of the consonants themselves. Where a derived root already contains letters that resemble a theophoric element, the addition of a suffix produces a name that appears to double up, and the eye reads it as two names joined rather than as the output of the standard procedure.

And it is partly the accumulated effect of transmission. The name has passed through Hebrew, Latin, French and English, and each stage has made its own decisions about aspirates, doubled letters and word division.

The general point this illustrates is worth more than the particular case. The seventy-two look uniform in a printed table, seventy-two tidy names in a column, and they are less uniform than they look. Some are ordinary Hebrew names that already existed. Some are pronounceable but unattested. Some are awkward, and the awkwardness is what one would expect from a mechanical procedure that takes whatever three letters fall next.

That the list contains awkward members is, again, evidence that it was derived rather than composed. A list of invented angel names would be euphonious throughout.

Meditation and Inner Peace: An Office from the Modern Side

The sixty-second is assigned meditation and inner peace in current lists. The phrase is worth examining, because the concept it names has itself been substantially reshaped in the same period that produced the attribution.

Meditation in the sources this system comes from means something fairly specific: discursive religious contemplation, the sustained turning over of a scriptural text or a divine attribute, in the Christian devotional tradition and in its Kabbalistic parallels. It is verbal, directed and doctrinally furnished.

Meditation in the register the modern attribute lists are written in means something else, a practice of attention, often non-verbal, often framed as secular, and shaped by the twentieth-century transmission of Buddhist and Hindu techniques into Europe and North America. That transmission is well studied and its history is not long.

An attribute list that assigns an angel to meditation and inner peace is therefore not translating a term; it is using a modern word that its earlier layers did not have in this sense.

The observation generalises across the whole attribute column. Terms such as manifestation, self-improvement, transformation, energy, breakthrough and connection carry meanings shaped by the last century of popular spiritual writing, and reading them back into a seventeenth-century angelology produces a systematic anachronism, one that is invisible precisely because the words are ordinary English.

This is the subtlest of the dating problems in the material, and the hardest to correct for. Provenance can be established for a name, a verse or a tarot card. A drift in the meaning of a common word leaves no citation trail at all.

Sources La Science CabalistiqueLazare Lenain with The Birth of Insight: Meditation, Modern Buddhism, and the Burmese Monk Ledi SayadawErik Braun

Cross-Tradition Connections

Originates in Language

Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)Anonymous (multiple authors)
Sources
1. Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Shlomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)Sukkah 45aView the Source
2. Sefer ha-Bahir (The Book of Illumination)
Anonymousthe sections working with the seventy-two-fold nameView the Source
3. The Zohar
Traditionally attributed to Moses de LeonBeshallach 52aView the Source
4. De Arte Cabalistica (On the Art of Kabbalah)
Johann Reuchlin, Abaris Books, 1517Passim
Quote, Passim
The suffixed forms as first systematically listed, from which the awkward as well as the euphonious members of the set descend.
View the Source
5. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the chapters on the Bahir and on the ZoharView the Source
6. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous (multiple authors)Exodus 14:19-21View the Source
7. The Babylonian Talmud
Anonymous (multiple authors), Soncino Press, 1935Kiddushin 71aView the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.