Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

14C Dating of the Titulus Crucis

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a peer reviewed radiocarbon dating study published in the journal Radiocarbon, the leading specialist venue for radiocarbon method and results, by Francesco Bella and Carlo Azzi. It reports a direct 14C measurement of the wood of the Titulus Crucis relic venerated at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme in Rome, finding a calibrated two sigma range of AD 980 to 1146, a clearly medieval date rather than a first century one. As a physical dating result published under peer review in the field's own specialist journal, it carries strong authority for the specific empirical question it tested, when the wood itself was cut. Its limit is scope, a laboratory result about the object's material date, not a historical argument about when or why the inscription was carved onto that wood, so it settles the dating question directly while leaving the relic's later devotional and art historical history to other sources.

Facts
Citation
Author
Francesco Bella and Carlo Azzi
Publisher
Radiocarbon (vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 685-689)
Publication Year
2002
URL
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/14c-dating-of-the-titulus-crucis/E0FFBA7E6A68A5B7196ECF3F318C2D8C
Source Type
journal
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
This peer reviewed radiocarbon dating study, published in the specialist journal Radiocarbon, is treated at the top tier as peer reviewed journal scholarship carrying strong authority for the specific empirical dating question it tested.
Notes
Peer-reviewed radiocarbon dating of the Titulus Crucis panel: AD 980-1146 (2 sigma), a medieval date.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Rome, Cities

This source names Rome directly: "at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme in Rome, finding a calibrated two sigma range of AD 980 to 1146, a clearly medieval date rather than a first century one."

Source 14C Dating of the Titulus CrucisFrancesco Bella and Carlo Azzi
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.