Home›Sources›A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care UnitSourcesA Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care UnitCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-the-effects-of-remote-intercessory-prayer-on-outcomes-in-patients-admitted-to-the-coronary-care-unit.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-the-effects-of-remote-intercessory-prayer-on-outcomes-in-patients-admitted-to-the-coronary-care-unitCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-the-eff, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-the-effects-of-remote-intercessory-prayer-on-outcomes-in-patients-admitted-to-the-coronary-care-unit}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXWilliam Harris and colleagues' 1999 randomized controlled trial in the Archives of Internal Medicine on remote intercessory prayer is a peer reviewed clinical study. Its strength is that it is a larger, more carefully controlled trial than the earlier Byrd study of the same general question, published in a major medical journal. Its limit is that it reported an effect on a composite outcome score rather than on the individual clinical measures usually tracked, a design choice later commentators have questioned, and subsequent larger trials on intercessory prayer have generally found no effect.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (8 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed clinical study in a major medical journal, a more carefully controlled trial than its predecessor though its own design choices have drawn later methodological questions.NotesWell-attestedPeer-reviewed randomized controlled trial of remote intercessory prayer on coronary care patients, Archives of Internal Medicine, 1999.CitationAuthorWell-attestedWilliam S. Harris and colleaguesPublisherWell-attestedArchives of Internal MedicinePublication YearWell-attested1999Source TypeWell-attestedpeer-reviewed articleClaims Backed By This Source (8 claims)This source backs 8 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested.Disposition By TopicSources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.Well-attested8ArticlesWhy the Composite Score Is the ProblemSourcesA Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care UnitComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year