Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

A Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is an official confessional statement issued by the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the rabbinical body of Reform Judaism, in 1999, a primary institutional document rather than a scholarly account of Reform belief. As a primary source it is the strongest possible evidence for what the Reform rabbinate itself formally affirmed at that specific moment, since it is the movement's own statement rather than someone's characterization of it. Its limit is that Reform Jewish thought is intentionally non dogmatic and has issued different statements of principle at different points in its history reflecting real change over time, so this 1999 statement should be understood as one point in that ongoing conversation, not as an unchanging creed, and an earlier or later statement of principles would say some things differently.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism, the Reform movement's own platform adopted at Pittsburgh in 1999 by the Central Conference of American Rabbis. The movement's own governing statement, carrying custodian standing for its doctrine of informed individual autonomy in observance.
Notes
The Reform movement's own platform, adopted at Pittsburgh in 1999; the authority for the movement's doctrine of informed individual autonomy in observance.
Citation
Author
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Publisher
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Publication Year
1999
URL
https://www.ccarnet.org/rabbinic-voice/platforms/article-statement-principles-reform-judaism/
Source Type
Confessional statement
Custodian
Custodian Source
Yes
Custodian Body
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Custodian Basis
A statement of principles adopted by the rabbinical body of a Jewish movement. Authoritative for what Reform Judaism says about itself.
Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)

This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 2 held Differently. Plus 13 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 17 claims: 11 well-attested, 6 general references.
  • Sources, 11 claims: 11 well-attested.
  • Doctrines, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 held Differently, 3 general references.
  • Councils and Synods, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Denominations, 2 claims: 1 held Differently, 1 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 2 claims: 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Holds

1

Critiqued Here

1

Religious Roles & Titles

Held Differently

2

Denominations

Doctrines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.