The Joseph Smith Papers Project's own digitized archive presenting all four surviving first-person accounts of Joseph Smith's First Vision, alongside images of the original manuscripts. Its strength is that it is a primary documentary record, letting a reader compare Smith's own several tellings directly rather than relying on a later paraphrase. Its limit is that it is published and maintained by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints itself, the institution whose founding narrative the vision is, so an independent historian's analysis of the accounts' differences is needed for any claim about what those differences mean.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Tier one: the church's own digitized archive presenting all four surviving first-person accounts alongside images of the original manuscripts, a primary documentary record rather than a secondary analysis. NotesThe Church's own digitized archive presenting all four surviving first-person accounts (1832, 1835, 1838 and 1842) alongside images of the original manuscripts; a primary documentary record rather than a secondary analysis. Tier 1. No single publication year applies: this is a maintained digital archive, not a dated edition, so publication-year is left blank rather than guessed.
Citation
AuthorThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith Papers Project
PublisherJoseph Smith Papers Project
URLhttps://www.josephsmithpapers.org/site/accounts-of-the-first-vision
Source Typeprimary source / official record
Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)
This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Religious Events, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.