Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis, Andrew J. Vickers and colleagues' 2018 paper in The Journal of Pain, pools individual patient data from nearly 20,000 participants across 39 trials and finds acupuncture outperforms sham needling for several chronic pain conditions, including back and neck pain, osteoarthritis and migraine, though with small effect sizes. Its strength is that individual patient data meta-analysis is among the most rigorous evidence synthesis methods available, in a peer reviewed pain research journal. Its limit is that the effect sizes it reports are explicitly described as small, so the finding supports a modest clinical effect rather than a large one.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Andrew J. Vickers and colleagues' 2018 individual patient data meta-analysis in The Journal of Pain, the top tier reflecting among the most rigorous evidence synthesis methods available, pooling data from nearly 20,000 participants in a peer reviewed pain research journal. Its limit is that the effect sizes it reports are explicitly described as small, so the finding supports a modest clinical effect rather than a large one.
Notes
Pooled data from nearly 20,000 patients across 39 trials; found acupuncture outperforms sham needling for several chronic pain conditions including back/neck pain, osteoarthritis, and migraine, with small effect sizes.
Citation
Author
Andrew J. Vickers et al.
Publisher
The Journal of Pain
Publication Year
2018
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

1

Disciplines

General References

1

Disciplines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.