Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Akhenaten and the Religion of Light

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Erik Hornung's Akhenaten and the Religion of Light, translated by David Lorton, is a scholarly study by one of the leading twentieth century Egyptologists, examining the pharaoh's Amarna-period religious reforms centered on the sun disk Aten. Hornung's authority rests on direct command of the primary hieroglyphic and archaeological record from Amarna, and the book is respected as a careful, non-sensationalized treatment of a period that has attracted considerable popular speculation about monotheism and hidden influence on later religions. Hornung himself is notably cautious about overstating Atenism's continuity with later monotheistic traditions, a restraint worth carrying into any claim this source is used to support about direct historical influence, since that broader claim remains debated among Egyptologists rather than settled by this book alone.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Erik Hornung's Akhenaten and the Religion of Light, translated by David Lorton and published by Cornell University Press, is a scholarly study by one of the leading twentieth century Egyptologists, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship resting on direct command of the primary Amarna record.
Notes
Hornung on the Amarna reform: the theology of the Aten, its break with the traditional pantheon, and the question of whether it should be called monotheism.
Citation
Author
Erik Hornung (translated by David Lorton)
Publisher
Cornell University Press
Publication Year
2001
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Aten, Deities

This source names Aten directly: "Erik Hornung's Akhenaten and the Religion of Light, translated by David Lorton, is a scholarly study by one of the leading twentieth century Egyptologists, examining the pharaoh's Amarna-period..."

Source Akhenaten and the Religion of LightErik Hornung (translated by David Lorton)
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Deities, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Prayers, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.