Jennifer Snook is a sociologist, and this academic book, published by Temple University Press, studies American Heathenry, the modern revival of pre-Christian Germanic and Norse religion, examining how practitioners construct religious and ethnic identity within the movement, including its internal disputes over race and inclusion. Its strength is direct sociological fieldwork with American Heathen communities and organizations, letting Snook document real internal debate rather than presenting the movement as ideologically uniform. Its limit is that it focuses on the American context and the period of Snook's own fieldwork, so Heathenry's development in other countries or in the years since publication needs separate, more current sources to track fully.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Jennifer Snook's sociological study, published by Temple University Press, of American Heathenry (Asatru and related Germanic Neopaganism), examining how its adherents construct religious and racial identity, including the movement's internal divide between inclusive and racialist strands. NotesSociological study of American Heathenry (Asatru and related Germanic Neopaganism), examining how its adherents construct religious and racial identity, including the movement's internal divide between inclusive and racialist strands. Use for established sociological facts about American Heathenry as a contemporary movement.
Citation
AuthorJennifer Snook
PublisherTemple University Press
Publication Year2015
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Norse directly: "revival of pre-Christian Germanic and Norse religion, examining how practitioners construct religious and ethnic identity within the movement, including its internal disputes over race and inclusion."
Claims Backed By This Source (82 claims)
This source backs 82 claims across the atlas. As facts: 58 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 12 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Doctrines, 30 claims: 18 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 5 general references.
- Articles, 15 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Religions, 15 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Symbols, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Rituals, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Subcategories, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.