Jessica Utts's An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning, published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration in 1996, is a statistician's peer reviewed evaluation of remote viewing and related parapsychological experimental data, notably including work connected to the government funded Stargate program. Utts herself is a credentialed academic statistician, which gives the piece a genuine methodological voice on the data's statistical properties. Its limit is the same one that applies to the broader literature it evaluates: its conclusions on the statistical significance of the reviewed data have been publicly disputed by other statisticians and psychologists, including a companion critical assessment commissioned for the same government review, and the effect it discusses is not accepted within mainstream psychology or physics. Cite it as a documented position within a real and ongoing scientific dispute, not as a settled finding.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Jessica Utts's An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning, published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration in 1996, the middle tier reflecting Utts's own standing as a credentialed academic statistician, notwithstanding that its conclusions on statistical significance have been publicly disputed by other statisticians and psychologists and the effect it discusses is not accepted within mainstream psychology or physics. NotesPeer-reviewed assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1996.
Citation
AuthorJessica Utts
PublisherJournal of Scientific Exploration
Publication Year1996
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Studies, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.