Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

An Astrological Mandala

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Dane Rudhyar was an astrologer and composer who developed what became known as humanistic astrology, and this book is his own presentation of degree by degree symbolic meanings for the astrological wheel, a system of correspondences he devised himself. As with other primary works in which a practitioner sets out an astrological technique of his own invention and presents it as a coherent symbolic system, the atlas holds it at the tier appropriate to that kind of source rather than to independent verification, since no outside test of the symbols' validity is offered in the book itself. Its value is as the clearest primary statement of Rudhyar's own influential system in his own words, documenting a real and lasting strand of twentieth century astrological practice rather than evidence the symbols describe anything beyond the tradition's own claims.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Dane Rudhyar's own 1973 rewriting of the Sabian symbols, adding a keynote to each degree; cited for the history of that revision, a modern practitioner's reworking rather than an independent scholarly source, and no text from it is reproduced on this site.
Notes
Rudhyar's rewriting of the 1925 set, with a one-line keynote added to each degree. Copyright 1973, notice present, protected in the United States until 2069. Cited here for the history of the set only. No Symbol, Keynote or commentary text from this book is reproduced on this site.
Citation
Author
Dane Rudhyar
Publisher
Vintage Books / Random House
Publication Year
1973
URL
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5421296M/An_astrological_mandala
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (78 claims)

This source backs 78 claims across the atlas. As facts: 57 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 8 connected. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 50 claims: 35 well-attested, 3 holds, 8 connected, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Esoteric Texts, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.