Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Peter B. Golden is a historian of the Eurasian steppe, and this Otto Harrassowitz book is his standard academic survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and spread from the early medieval period across Central Asia and beyond. Its strength is comprehensive linguistic and historical grounding across an enormous span of peoples, languages and centuries that most single studies do not attempt to cover together, drawing on Golden's own command of the relevant primary sources in multiple languages. Its limit is that a survey working at this scale necessarily moves quickly across any one people's or period's specific history, so a claim about one particular Turkic group in one particular century is better checked against a focused study of that group than treated as fully settled by this wide angle survey alone.

Facts
Citation
Author
Peter B. Golden
Publisher
Otto Harrassowitz
Publication Year
1992
URL
https://archive.org/details/golden_202303
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Peter Golden's standard scholarly survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, from Otto Harrassowitz.
Notes
Standard scholarly survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "Golden is a historian of the Eurasian steppe, and this Otto Harrassowitz book is his standard academic survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and..."

This source names Turkic Peoples directly: "of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and spread from the early medieval period across Central Asia and beyond."

Claims Backed By This Source (64 claims)

This source backs 64 claims across the atlas. As facts: 42 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 1 connected. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 18 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Languages, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Spread Events, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Language Families, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
  • Cultures, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

3

Language Families

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.