Home›Sources›Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresSourcesApplication of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measures." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/application-of-the-convention-on-the-prevention-and-punishment-of-the-crime-of-genocide-the-gambia-v-myanmar-order-on-provisional-measures.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measures. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/application-of-the-convention-on-the-prevention-and-punishment-of-the-crime-of-genocide-the-gambia-v-myanmar-order-on-provisional-measuresCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-application-of-the-convention-on-the-pre, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measures}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/application-of-the-convention-on-the-prevention-and-punishment-of-the-crime-of-genocide-the-gambia-v-myanmar-order-on-provisional-measures}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXThe International Court of Justice's own order on provisional measures in Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), 2020, is a primary legal record, confirmed against independent legal reporting of the order's own January 2020 date. Its strength is that it is the Court's actual order, not a secondary account of what the Court decided in the early stage of the case. Its limit is the ordinary one for an order on provisional measures specifically: it is a preliminary ruling on interim protective steps, not the Court's eventual judgment on the merits of the genocide claim itself.FactsCross-Tradition ConnectionsClaims Backed By This Source (9 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Reliability tier 1: the Court's own actual order, confirmed against independent legal reporting of its date, a preliminary ruling on interim measures rather than the Court's eventual judgment on the merits.NotesWell-attestedThe International Court of Justice's own order on provisional measures in The Gambia v. Myanmar (2020); the court's ruling on the case before it, not an independent scholarly account of the Rohingya genocide.CitationAuthorWell-attestedInternational Court of JusticePublication YearWell-attested2020Source TypeWell-attestedCase lawCross-Tradition ConnectionsAssociated WithGambia, Countries Well-attested This source names Gambia directly: "of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v."Source Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresInternational Court of Justicetier 1Myanmar, Countries Well-attested This source names Myanmar directly: "the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), 2020, is a primary legal record, confirmed against independent legal reporting of the order's own January 2020 date."Source Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresInternational Court of Justicetier 1Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds.Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.Well-attested6SourcesApplication of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresHolds2SourcesApplication of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Order on provisional measuresGeneral References1CulturesRohingyaComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year