Fouad Ben Ahmed and Robert Pasnau's Averroes entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed reference article by specialists in Islamic and medieval philosophy, published in an encyclopedia that commissions entries from recognized experts under academic editorial review. Its authority rests on the authors' direct scholarly engagement with Averroes's own philosophical and legal corpus and its complex transmission into Latin scholastic thought. As a reference entry, it orients readers to the existing state of Averroes scholarship, including genuinely disputed questions about how far Averroes's own positions align with the more radical Latin Averroism later attributed to him, rather than resolving those disputes, and its bibliography is designed to lead readers to the specialist monographs that argue those points in full.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; precedent for this exact publication is 22 of 23 tiered sibling entries at tier 2, followed as the established convention. NotesStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published June 23, 2021; last substantive revision August 20, 2025, authors confirmed via the entry's own citation info, consulted directly. Minted to give Averroes his own dedicated citation rather than sharing the general Al-Kindi source the four Falsafa edges carried until now.
Citation
AuthorFouad Ben Ahmed and Robert Pasnau
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2021
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-rushd/
Source Typereference
Matched to "reference", the value 22 of 23 sibling Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries already carry. Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Philosophical Schools, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.