This University of Birmingham announcement reporting the radiocarbon dating of its Qur'an manuscript fragment is the institution's own primary account of a genuinely significant and independently notable finding, that the parchment dates with 95.4 percent probability to between 568 and 645 CE, placing it among the oldest known Qur'an fragments. As the testing institution's own report, it is authoritative for the radiocarbon results themselves, which were produced by an accredited laboratory using standard scientific method. The dating's interpretive significance is more contested: several manuscript specialists, including Francois Deroche and Mustafa Shah, have questioned whether the script's developed style fits comfortably within that early range and noted radiocarbon dating's inherent decades-wide uncertainty for parchment, so the parchment's age and the text's precise date of writing are not necessarily the same question.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
This University of Birmingham announcement reports radiocarbon results from an accredited laboratory using standard scientific method, the middle tier reflecting that it is the testing institution's own announcement rather than a peer reviewed paper, and that manuscript specialists have contested the dating's interpretive significance. NotesThe University of Birmingham's own announcement of the radiocarbon dating of its early Qur'an manuscript fragment (2015); an institutional press announcement, not an independent codicological study.
Citation
AuthorUniversity of Birmingham
PublisherUniversity of Birmingham
Publication Year2015
Source Typeinstitutional announcement
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Textual Witnesses, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Custodians & Museums, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.