Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Buddhist Goddesses of India

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Miranda Shaw is a scholar of Buddhist studies, and this Princeton University Press book is her academic survey of the goddess figures of Indian and Himalayan Buddhism, examining figures such as Tara against the wider Mahayana tradition's attitudes toward women practitioners. Its strength is a specific and debated argument, that motherhood and female agency are more central to how these goddess figures were conceived than earlier, more male centered scholarship recognized, made through close reading of Sanskrit and Tibetan primary sources rather than general survey alone. Its limit is that it is an argument as much as a survey, so where Shaw's specific interpretive claims are contested by other Buddhist studies scholars, a reader should check the wider secondary literature rather than treat this book's reading as the field's settled consensus.

Facts
Citation
Author
Miranda Shaw
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Publication Year
2006
URL
https://archive.org/details/buddhistgoddesse00shaw
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Miranda Shaw's Princeton University Press monograph reading the Buddhist goddess Tara's cult against Mahayana attitudes toward women practitioners in sixth century India.
Notes
Publisher left NULL: not verified. Shaw argues motherhood is central to the conception of Tara and reads her against Mahayana attitudes to women practitioners in sixth-century India.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Tara, Deities

This source names Tara directly: "Buddhism, examining figures such as Tara against the wider Mahayana tradition's attitudes toward women practitioners."

Source Buddhist Goddesses of IndiaMiranda Shaw
Claims Backed By This Source (60 claims)

This source backs 60 claims across the atlas. As facts: 45 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 20 claims: 10 well-attested, 4 holds, 6 general references.
  • Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 12 claims: 11 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Mantras, 12 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.