Terryl Givens is an academic scholar of American religious history, and this is a scholarly study of the Book of Mormon's origins, its own claims, its reception and the historicity debate that surrounds it, working from that debate's actual documented positions on multiple sides rather than advocating one conclusion as settled. That balanced, source based treatment of a genuinely contested question is the study's real evidentiary basis. Use it for established scholarly facts about how the Book of Mormon has been received and debated and for a balanced account of the historicity question; a claim about the movement's own confessional position on its origin needs the Book of Mormon itself or the church's own statement instead.
Facts
Citation
AuthorTerryl L. Givens
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year2002
URLhttps://www.worldcat.org/oclc/47790402
Source Typebook
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Terryl Givens's academic study of the Book of Mormon, its origins, its claims, its reception and the historicity debate around it, published by Oxford University Press. NotesAcademic study of the Book of Mormon, its origins, its claims, its reception, and the historicity debate around it.
Claims Backed By This Source (101 claims)
This source backs 101 claims across the atlas. As facts: 48 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 31 holds. Plus 19 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scripture Portions, 79 claims: 34 well-attested, 30 holds, 15 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Scriptures & Texts, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Figures, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Sites, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.