Wikipedia's article on Casimir Stanislas d'Arpentigny, the nineteenth century French officer credited with founding modern chirognomy, the study of hand shape in palmistry, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. It is reliable for standard biographical facts such as his military career and his authorship of the foundational chirognomy text, and less reliable for evaluating chirognomy's own claims. Use it for basic biography; a claim about the validity of hand shape reading needs an independent source, since palmistry itself carries no scientific verification.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Wikipedia's article on Casimir Stanislas d'Arpentigny, credited with founding modern chirognomy, the lower tier reflecting that it is a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, reliable for standard biography and less reliable for evaluating chirognomy's own claims, since palmistry itself carries no scientific verification. NotesWikipedia's article on Casimir Stanislas d'Arpentigny. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Casimir Stanislas d'Arpentigny (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_Stanislas_d%27Arpentigny
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.