Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, application no. 18147/02

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, application no. 18147/02, the European Court of Human Rights' judgment of 5 April 2007 issued by its First Section, is a primary legal document, a binding international court judgment rather than commentary or analysis. Its authority is that of a court of record adjudicating a specific dispute between the Moscow Scientology congregation and the Russian state over registration refusal, under the European Convention on Human Rights. Its limit is that it decides the legal question actually before the court, registration and freedom of religion under the Convention, not a general assessment of Scientology's beliefs or practices. Cite it for this specific legal finding and its stated reasoning.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, the European Court of Human Rights' 2007 judgment, the top tier reflecting that it is a binding international court judgment rather than commentary. Its limit is that it decides the specific legal question of registration and freedom of religion under the Convention before the court, not a general assessment of Scientology's beliefs or practices.
Notes
Judgment of 5 April 2007, First Section.
Citation
Author
European Court of Human Rights
Publisher
European Court of Human Rights
Publication Year
2007
URL
http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2007/258.html
Source Type
Case law
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Moscow, Cities

This source names Moscow directly: "Church of Scientology Moscow v."

Source Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, application no. 18147/02European Court of Human Rights
Russia, Countries

This source names Russia directly: "Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, application no."

Source Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, application no. 18147/02European Court of Human Rights
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • New Religious Movements, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.