Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, edited by Julian P. T. Higgins and Sally Green and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration, is the standard methodological reference for how to conduct a rigorous systematic review of medical and health interventions, used internationally by researchers producing the evidence syntheses that inform clinical guidelines. Its strength is that it is produced by the organization that essentially defined modern systematic review methodology, continually updated by working groups of specialist methodologists rather than a single author's opinion. Its limit is that the handbook teaches how to properly synthesize and weigh existing studies, it is not itself a source of substantive medical or scientific findings, so it should be cited here only when the atlas needs to reference the standard for how evidence is systematically evaluated, never as a source for any specific claim about religion, health or paranormal phenomena in its own right.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: the standard methodological reference maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration, the organization that defined the method it documents, continually updated by specialist working groups rather than one author's opinion.
Notes
The Cochrane Collaboration's standard methodological handbook for conducting systematic reviews of interventions.
Citation
Author
Julian P. T. Higgins and Sally Green (editors)
Publisher
Cochrane Collaboration
Publication Year
2011
Source Type
Scholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scholarly Disciplines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.