Sources
Confucianism (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Wikipedia's article on Confucianism, consulted 2026-08-13.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Reliability tier 3: a continuously community-edited tertiary reference with no formal peer review process, suitable for citable, checkable factual claims but not treated as authoritative on genuinely contested points. NotesWikipedia's article on Confucianism, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here specifically for its zhong subsection, which frames the virtue as a reciprocal duty between prince and minister rather than one-directional subservience, and for its note that later eras placed more weight on the ruled's obligations to the ruler and less on the reverse.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confucianism
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Confucianism directly: "Wikipedia's article on Confucianism, consulted 2026-08-13."
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.