Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Metraux, "The Dispute between the Soka Gakkai and the Nichiren Shoshu Priesthood: A Lay Revolution against a Conservative Clergy" (Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 1992)

source

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A citation to Daniel A. Metraux's peer-reviewed article on the 1990 to 1991 dispute between Soka Gakkai and the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood, read directly via the Nanzan Institute's own repository copy. Its strength is that Metraux documents the November 1991 excommunication in institutional detail as it happened, drawing on contemporary Japanese press coverage, and its own footnote four defines the Dai Gohonzon's place within Nichiren Shoshu's Three Great Secret Laws doctrine. Its limit is that, published within a year of the schism, it cannot speak to the priesthood's subsequent decades-long practice regarding transcription and access, only to the dispute's opening phase.

Facts
Citation
Author
Daniel A. Metraux
Publisher
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture
Publication Year
1992
URL
https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/journal/6/article/835/pdf/download
Source Type
Journal article
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer-reviewed article in the Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, published by the Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture, the strongest available evidentiary form for a claim about an internal dispute within a Buddhist movement.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Nichiren directly: "dispute between Soka Gakkai and the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood, read directly via the Nanzan Institute's own repository copy."

This source names Nichiren Shoshu directly: "dispute between Soka Gakkai and the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood, read directly via the Nanzan Institute's own repository copy."

This source names Soka Gakkai directly: "Metraux's peer-reviewed article on the 1990 to 1991 dispute between Soka Gakkai and the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood, read directly via the Nanzan Institute's own repository copy."

Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.