De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, known as On the Donation of Constantine, Lorenzo Valla's 1440 treatise, is the foundational philological work that demonstrated the supposed imperial grant of authority from Constantine to the pope was a medieval forgery, using textual and historical analysis of the document's own language and anachronisms. Valla's authority rests on that close philological argument, which later scholarship has upheld as essentially correct. Its limit is that it is a fifteenth century polemical treatise, written in the context of Valla's own political and ecclesiastical disputes, not a neutral modern textual history. Cite it for the forgery argument itself; a modern account of the Donation's history needs a dedicated scholarly study.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Lorenzo Valla's 1440 treatise On the Donation of Constantine, the top tier reflecting the foundational philological work demonstrating the supposed Constantinian grant was a medieval forgery, an argument later scholarship has upheld as essentially correct. Its limit is that it is a fifteenth century polemical treatise written amid Valla's own political and ecclesiastical disputes; a modern account of the Donation's history needs a dedicated scholarly study. NotesLorenzo Valla's foundational philological treatise proving the Donation of Constantine a forgery, 1440.
Citation
AuthorLorenzo Valla
Publication Year1440
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)
This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Organizations, 2 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.