Development of human palmar and digital flexion creases, by Cathy A. Stevens, John C. Carey, Manish Shah and G. P. Bagley, published in The Journal of Pediatrics in 1988, is a peer reviewed developmental biology study examining one hundred fetal hands between seven and nineteen weeks gestation, establishing that digital creases are well defined by ten weeks and palmar creases consistently present by thirteen weeks. Its strength is that it is a direct anatomical study with a stated sample and method, the kind of primary evidence a claim about prenatal hand development should rest on. Its limit is precisely the narrowness that makes it reliable, it documents when these creases form and nothing about their folk or divinatory interpretation, so it is cited here only for the developmental timeline itself; any claim connecting palm creases to palmistry or fortune telling practice needs a source on that tradition, not this study, which makes no such claim.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Stevens, Carey, Shah and Bagley's 1988 study in The Journal of Pediatrics is a peer reviewed developmental biology study with a stated sample and method, treated at the top tier as direct anatomical primary evidence for prenatal hand development. NotesOne hundred fetal hands, 7 to 19 fetal weeks. Digital creases well defined by 10 weeks, palmar creases consistently present by 13 weeks.
Citation
AuthorCathy A. Stevens, John C. Carey, Manish Shah and G. P. Bagley
PublisherThe Journal of Pediatrics 113(1), 128-132
Publication Year1988
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(88)80546-8
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 partially Attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 partially Attested.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Palm Lines, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.