Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Divinity Atlas Relation Vocabulary

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

An internal source, not outside scholarship: the atlas's own register of the words used to describe a connection between two entries, the forward word one page reads and the reverse word the other reads. It establishes only what the atlas itself calls a relationship, never that the relationship holds true of the world, which is a separate question resting on whatever citation the relationship itself carries. It is rated at the top of the reliability scale for the one purpose it serves, recording the atlas's own vocabulary accurately, and for nothing beyond that.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The atlas's own register of the words its connections are drawn with, establishing only what the atlas itself calls a relationship, never that the relationship holds true, which rests on whatever citation the relationship itself carries.
Notes
The atlas's own register of the words its edges are drawn with: the forward word a subject's page reads, and the inverse word the object's page reads. It establishes only what the atlas calls a relationship, never that the relationship holds. A claim carried on an edge rests on whatever that edge itself cites.
Citation
Source Type
reference-database
Claims Backed By This Source (407 claims)

This source backs 407 claims across the atlas. As facts: 273 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 131 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Relation Types, 403 claims: 269 well-attested, 3 holds, 131 general references.
  • Sources, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.