Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

ESP: A Scientific Evaluation

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

C. E. M. Hansel was a psychologist, and this Charles Scribner's Sons book is his skeptical scientific evaluation of the experimental evidence offered for extrasensory perception, examining major studies for methodological weaknesses including the possibility of fraud and poor controls. Its strength is that it is a systematic, methodology focused critique from within experimental psychology, addressing specific published studies point by point rather than dismissing the field in general terms. Its limit is its age: it evaluates the ESP experiments current in the mid twentieth century, so a claim about later parapsychology research, including studies conducted after this book's publication, needs more recent critical literature alongside it.

Facts
Citation
Author
C. E. M. Hansel
Publisher
Charles Scribner's Sons
Publication Year
1966
URL
https://archive.org/details/espscientificeva00hans
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
C. E. M. Hansel was an academic psychologist conducting a methodical scientific evaluation of the parapsychology literature, published by Charles Scribner's Sons, treated at the top tier as rigorous documented scientific analysis.
Notes
Skeptical scientific evaluation of the experimental evidence for extrasensory perception.
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)

This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 4 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 4 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Studies, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

2

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.