Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Genocide in Bosnia: The Policy of "Ethnic Cleansing" (Cigar)

Norman Cigar, Texas A&M University Press, 1995

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Norman Cigar's 1995 study, published by Texas A&M University Press, arguing that the mass killing of Bosnian Muslims was the planned outcome of a deliberate Serbian policy of ethnic cleansing rather than the unintended byproduct of civil war. Written and published while the war's toll was still being tallied in real time, it works from the wartime and immediate postwar casualty figures then current in reporting and early scholarship, a range of roughly 200,000 dead that later demographic research, including record-linkage studies verified against the pre-war census, substantially revised downward. Its strength is a close documentary case for policy intent behind the killing. Its limit, for a casualty figure specifically, is that it reflects the estimate current at the time of writing rather than the lower, later, individually verified count.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A named scholar's academic press monograph, standard in the field for the war's policy of ethnic cleansing, whose casualty figure reflects the wartime-era estimate current when it was written rather than later, lower, demographically verified research.
Notes
Cited for the higher, wartime and early postwar estimate of the Bosnian War death toll, current in the literature before later demographic research revised it down.
Citation
Author
Norman Cigar
Publisher
Texas A&M University Press
Publication Year
1995
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Texas directly: "Norman Cigar's 1995 study, published by Texas A&M University Press, arguing that the mass killing of Bosnian Muslims was the planned outcome of a deliberate Serbian policy of ethnic cleansing rather..."

Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Wars & Conflicts, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Wars & Conflicts

General References

1

Wars & Conflicts

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.