Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Moshe Idel's study works from the documented textual record of Jewish magical and mystical golem traditions across their full historical span, from late antiquity through the modern period, tracing how the concept and its associated practices actually developed and changed rather than presenting one fixed golem legend as representative of the whole tradition. That comprehensive, source-based historical method is the book's real evidentiary basis and the reason it remains the standard reference on the subject. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Idel's specific readings since 1990. Use it for established facts about the historical development of golem traditions across this span; a claim resting on one specific later popular golem legend needs a source addressing that specific legend and its own separate origin.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Moshe Idel's study working from the documented textual record of Jewish magical and mystical golem traditions across their full historical span, tracing how the concept and its practices actually developed rather than presenting one fixed legend as representative.
Notes
The comprehensive treatment of golem traditions from late antiquity to the modern period.
Citation
Author
Moshe Idel
Publisher
State University of New York Press
Publication Year
1990
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Questions Resolved By This

Establishes no source attaches a golem to Judah Loew ben Bezalel before the nineteenth century and that the 1909 book fixing the popular narrative is its author's own literary invention.

Claims Backed By This Source (148 claims)

This source backs 148 claims across the atlas. As facts: 106 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 4 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 2 connected. Plus 28 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Alphabet Letters, 88 claims: 66 well-attested, 22 general references.
  • Mythical Creatures, 13 claims: 8 well-attested, 4 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Open Questions, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 connected, 1 general references.
  • Myths & Sacred Narratives, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Cultures, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

3

Historical Figures

Popular myth - corrected

4

Mythical Creatures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.