Anita Quiles and colleagues' study on the dating of the parietal art of Grotte Chauvet-Pont d'Arc, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2016, is a peer reviewed radiocarbon dating study that examined charcoal from the cave's paintings and occupation layers directly, refining the chronology of one of the oldest known collections of parietal art. Its strength is that it is primary scientific dating evidence published in a leading peer reviewed general science journal, methodologically independent of any interpretation of what the images meant to the people who made them. Its limit is that radiocarbon dating establishes when the charcoal was made, strong evidence for when the associated images were painted but not direct evidence of intent or meaning, so a claim about the religious or ritual significance of the Chauvet paintings needs an archaeological or art historical source that argues that interpretation, not this dating study alone.
Facts
Citation
AuthorAnita Quiles and others
PublisherProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(17)
Publication Year2016
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523158113
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Anita Quiles and colleagues' dating study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2016, is a peer reviewed radiocarbon dating study in a leading general science journal, treated at the top tier as primary scientific evidence. NotesPeer-reviewed radiocarbon dating study of the parietal art of Grotte Chauvet-Pont d'Arc.
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.