Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Hand et al. v. Ray et al. (United States District Court, District of Arizona)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Hand et al. v. Ray et al., a federal lawsuit filed November 2009 by Floyd Hand Jr. and other Oglala delegates to the Black Hills Sioux Nation Treaty Council in the United States District Court, District of Arizona, Case No. CV 09 8196 PCT FJM, alleges that James Arthur Ray, Angel Valley Retreat Center, the United States and the State of Arizona desecrated the sacred Oinikiga and violated the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty. Its strength is that it is the official federal court record of the Lakota nation's own legal response to the events. Its limit is that it documents the lawsuit's filing and claims, not its ultimate disposition, and it is not itself a source for ceremonial content.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Tier one: the official federal court record of the Lakota nation's own legal response, filed in the United States District Court, District of Arizona. Its limit is that it documents the lawsuit's filing and claims, not its ultimate disposition, and it is not itself a source for ceremonial content.
Notes
Federal lawsuit filed November 2009 by Floyd Hand Jr. and other Oglala delegates to the Black Hills Sioux Nation Treaty Council against James Arthur Ray, Angel Valley Retreat Center, the United States and the State of Arizona, alleging desecration of the sacred Oinikiga and violation of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty. Official federal court record of the Lakota nation's own legal response, not ceremonial content.
Citation
Author
United States District Court, District of Arizona (Prescott Division)
Publisher
Federal court record, Case No. CV-09-8196-PCT-FJM
Publication Year
2009
URL
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/sweat-lodge-saga-continues-south-dakota-indian-tribe-suing-james-arthur-ray-for-desecration-of-a-sacred-lakota-ceremony-6643066/
Source Type
Case law
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Practices, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.