Sources
Hypatia of Alexandria
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Maria Dzielska's Hypatia of Alexandria is a scholarly biography of the fourth century Neoplatonist philosopher and mathematician, written by a classicist working carefully to separate the historically documented Hypatia from the layered later legend, particularly the popular narrative crediting her murder entirely to Christian religious fanaticism, which Dzielska argues the primary sources support only in part, with genuine political rivalry between the prefect Orestes and Bishop Cyril also a documented factor. Its authority rests on close reading of the surviving ancient sources, including Socrates Scholasticus and other contemporaries, against the later, more elaborated retellings. As a corrective, source-critical biography it is well respected, though Hypatia's murder and its precise causes remain a topic scholars continue to weigh from the same limited ancient evidence Dzielska worked from.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Maria Dzielska's Hypatia of Alexandria, published by Harvard University Press, is a scholarly biography by a classicist working from the surviving ancient sources to separate the historical Hypatia from later legend, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship, notwithstanding that the precise causes of her murder remain a question later historians continue to weigh from the same limited ancient evidence. NotesReconstructs Hypatia from the contemporary evidence, principally the letters of Synesius, and dismantles the later legend of her as a martyr of science.
Citation
AuthorMaria Dzielska
PublisherHarvard University Press
Publication Year1995
Source Typeacademic biography
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Alexandria directly: "Maria Dzielska's Hypatia of Alexandria is a scholarly biography of the fourth century Neoplatonist philosopher and mathematician, written by a classicist working carefully to separate the..."
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Historical Figures, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.