Alexander Fleisher and Zhenia Fleisher published this peer-reviewed article in the journal Economic Botany in 1988, arguing from comparative ethnobotany of the oregano group herbs that the hyssop mentioned in the Bible is the carvacrol chemotype of what is now classified as Origanum syriacum. Its strength is a genuine, checkable botanical argument, the identification is reasoned from documented traditional usage patterns across the Mediterranean region rather than assumed from tradition alone, and its bibliographic details are independently confirmed against Crossref and NASA's astrophysics data system. Its limit is that the identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than from an ancient botanical description of the plant itself, which is exactly why the biblical hyssop's identity remains an open question rather than a settled one.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A peer reviewed botanical journal article arguing from comparative ethnobotany that the hyssop of the Bible is what is now called Origanum syriacum; the identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than an ancient botanical description, which is why the question stays open. NotesPages 232 to 241. Argues from the comparative ethnobotany of the oregano group herbs that the hyssop of the Bible is the carvacrol chemotype of Majorana syriaca, now treated as Origanum syriacum. The identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than from an ancient botanical description, which is why the question stays open. Bibliographic details confirmed against Crossref and the NASA ADS record; abstract read, full text not opened.
Citation
AuthorAlexander Fleisher and Zhenia Fleisher
PublisherEconomic Botany, volume 42, number 2
Publication Year1988
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858924
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)
This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 28 well-attested, 2 open question. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 4 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 21 claims: 15 well-attested, 4 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Studies, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 open question, 1 general references.
- Plants, 3 claims: 1 open question, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.