Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Inventing the Way of the Samurai: Nationalism, Internationalism, and Bushido in Modern Japan

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Oleg Benesch's Inventing the Way of the Samurai is a scholarly historical study demonstrating that bushido, now popularly imagined as an ancient warrior code, was substantially a modern intellectual construction assembled in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to serve Japanese nationalist and international identity needs. Its authority rests on close archival tracing of when and by whom specific bushido texts and ideas were actually written, work respected in Japanese history for correcting a widely held popular misconception. Because the book's central finding runs against a still-common popular assumption about samurai antiquity, it is worth reading Benesch's own careful distinction between genuine premodern warrior ethics, which did exist in varied and regional forms, and the codified, nationally unifying bushido narrative, which did not predate the Meiji era.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Oleg Benesch's Inventing the Way of the Samurai, published by Oxford University Press, is a scholarly historical study resting on close archival tracing of when and by whom specific bushido texts were actually written, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship.
Notes
The standard scholarly history of the bushido concept, arguing that the ethic as popularly understood is largely a Meiji-era construction assembled for nationalist and internationalist purposes.
Citation
Author
Oleg Benesch
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2014
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)

This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 7 scholarly debate. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Virtues, 14 claims: 3 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 7 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Doctrines, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.