Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Islam, Arabs, and the Intelligent World of the Jinn

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Amira El-Zein is a scholar of Islamic studies, and this academic book, published by Syracuse University Press, examines the jinn, the class of beings recognized in Islamic cosmology alongside humans and angels, tracing their treatment across the Quran, hadith and later Islamic intellectual and popular tradition. Its strength is bringing together theological, philosophical and folkloric sources on the jinn that are often treated separately, showing how a genuinely canonical concept also generated a rich popular tradition around it. Its limit is that popular belief about jinn varies considerably across different Muslim majority regions and cultures, and the book's synthesis, while grounded in textual sources, cannot fully capture every regional variant of jinn belief and practice.

Facts
Citation
Author
Amira El-Zein
Publisher
Syracuse University Press
Publication Year
2009
URL
https://archive.org/details/islam-arabs-and-the-intelligent-world-of-the-jinn-el-zein-amira-z-library
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Amira El-Zein's scholarly study, published by Syracuse University Press, of the jinn in Islamic thought.
Notes
Added wave8: scholarly study of the jinn in Islamic thought
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Syracuse, Cities

This source names Syracuse directly: "and this academic book, published by Syracuse University Press, examines the jinn, the class of beings recognized in Islamic cosmology alongside humans and angels, tracing their treatment across the..."

Claims Backed By This Source (105 claims)

This source backs 105 claims across the atlas. As facts: 73 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 11 holds. Plus 20 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Mythical Creatures, 56 claims: 36 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 7 holds, 12 general references.
  • Articles, 25 claims: 18 well-attested, 3 holds, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Myths & Sacred Narratives, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Subcategories, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Mythical Creatures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.