Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Rudolph Peters's Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam, A Reader, published by Markus Wiener Publishers in 1996, is a scholarly reader collecting primary classical Islamic legal texts on jihad alongside modern texts and Peters's own analytical framing, tracing how the doctrine's legal and political meaning developed from medieval jurisprudence through twentieth century movements. Peters was a specialist in Islamic law. Its strength is that it presents primary sources directly, in translation, rather than only summarizing them, letting a reader see the classical legal reasoning itself alongside its later reinterpretation. Its limit is that a reader anthology selects and arranges texts according to its editor's own organizing argument, so a claim about the full range of classical juristic opinion on jihad should be checked against a broader survey of Islamic legal literature beyond the texts Peters chose to include.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Rudolph Peters's Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam, published by Markus Wiener Publishers in 1996, is a scholarly reader by a specialist in Islamic law presenting primary classical legal texts directly in translation, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Scholarly reader collecting classical and modern Islamic texts and analysis on the doctrine of jihad.
Citation
Author
Rudolph Peters
Publisher
Markus Wiener Publishers
Princeton, per the publisher's own listing and the American Journal of Islam and Society review citing the same edition.
Publication Year
1996
Source Type
Scholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Schools of Religious Law, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Organizations, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

1

Doctrines

Holds

3

Organizations

Schools of Religious Law

General References

5

Doctrines

Schools of Religious Law

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.