Alex McKay is a historian of Indo-Tibetan history with a doctorate from SOAS, and this Brill monograph, part of Brill's Tibetan Studies Library, is his academic study of how Mount Kailash came to be constructed as sacred geography across Hindu, Buddhist and Bon renunciate traditions. Its strength, confirmed independently in reviews of the published book, is genuine multi-tradition fieldwork and textual research tracing how a shared idea of a heavenly mountain was mapped onto real Himalayan peaks over centuries, including the argument that much of today's Kailas pilgrimage geography is a comparatively recent construction shaped by colonial, Hindu modernist and New Age interests as much as by older tradition. Its limit is that this recency argument is itself a scholarly interpretation and not the last word, so a claim about any one tradition's own understanding of Kailas is better checked against a source from within that tradition specifically.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Alex McKay's Brill study of renunciate traditions and the historical construction of Mount Kailash as Himalayan sacred geography. NotesStudy of renunciate traditions and the historical construction of Mount Kailash as Himalayan sacred geography.
Citation
AuthorAlex McKay
PublisherBrill
Publication Year2015
Source Typebook
Claims Backed By This Source (48 claims)
This source backs 48 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Pilgrimage Routes, 15 claims: 9 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Sites, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Bodies of Water, 8 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.