Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Klaeber's Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg, fourth edition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Klaeber's Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg, fourth edition, edited by R. D. Fulk, Robert E. Bjork and John D. Niles and published by the University of Toronto Press in 2008, is the standard scholarly critical edition of the Old English poem, descending from Friedrich Klaeber's original early twentieth century edition and thoroughly revised with updated textual notes, glossary and a survey of a century of Beowulf scholarship. Its strength is that standing: it is the edition specialists cite by default and the one against which translations are checked. Its limit is textual rather than religious, since Beowulf's references to pagan custom sit inside a poem transmitted and probably shaped by Christian scribes, so a claim about pre-Christian Germanic belief drawn from the poem needs to be read through that layered transmission rather than taken as a direct window onto pagan practice.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by the University of Toronto Press as the standard scholarly critical edition of Beowulf, edited by named specialists and descending from Klaeber's original edition, the edition specialists cite by default.
Notes
The standard critical edition of Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg.
Citation
Author
R. D. Fulk, Robert E. Bjork and John D. Niles (eds.)
Publisher
University of Toronto Press
Publication Year
2008
Source Type
Critical edition
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 connected. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Other Writings, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Figures, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Mythical Creatures, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.