Chun-fang Yu specializes in Chinese Buddhism and this is the standard, extensively documented study of how the Indian bodhisattva Avalokitesvara became the Chinese Kuan-yin, working from Buddhist scripture, miracle tale literature, pilgrimage practice and art historical evidence together rather than from doctrine alone. Yu's own central argument, that the change is a documented process of Chinese indigenization rather than a simple import of an already female Indian figure, is grounded in that combined textual, narrative and art historical record. This record also carries forward here a specific finding once mistakenly attributed to a separate title: the dating of Kuan-yin's shift to female iconography to roughly the tenth through twelfth centuries is this book's own documented finding, not a separate companion source's. Use it for established scholarly facts about Kuan-yin's origin, gender transformation and cult across China; a claim about a specific regional cult practice today needs a more localized ethnographic source alongside it.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Chun-fang Yu's Columbia University Press study of Avalokitesvara's transformation into the female Chinese Kuan-yin, the standard scholarly treatment of the gender shift and its dating to roughly the tenth through twelfth centuries. NotesThe standard treatment of the gender shift. Yu argues the transformation is a Chinese process of indigenization rather than the import of an Indian female form. Also used for the dating of the shift to a female iconography, to roughly the tenth through twelfth centuries, a finding this same book documents rather than a separate companion source.
Citation
AuthorChun-fang Yu
PublisherColumbia University Press
Publication Year2001
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Avalokiteshvara directly: "study of how the Indian bodhisattva Avalokitesvara became the Chinese Kuan-yin, working from Buddhist scripture, miracle tale literature, pilgrimage practice and art historical evidence together..."
This source names China directly: "gender transformation and cult across China; a claim about a specific regional cult practice today needs a more localized ethnographic source alongside it."
Claims Backed By This Source (52 claims)
This source backs 52 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Mantras, 14 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Deities, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Scriptures & Texts, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Articles, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Sacred Sites, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.