Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad is a scholarly work aimed at a broad educated readership, examining how hadith, the reports of the Prophet Muhammad's sayings and actions, have been interpreted, contested and sometimes misused across Islamic history and into the modern period, written by a specialist in hadith studies and Islamic law. Its authority rests on Brown's close command of the classical hadith-critical tradition itself, which he presents as a sophisticated internal Muslim scholarly discipline rather than a modern Western import. Because the book engages contemporary controversies, including modern reformist and extremist uses of hadith, some of its specific interpretive judgments on those live debates have themselves drawn discussion from scholars and general readers who weigh the underlying sources differently than Brown does.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad, published by Oneworld, is a scholarly work by a specialist in hadith studies and Islamic law aimed at a broad educated readership, treated at the top tier on the strength of Brown's close command of the classical hadith critical tradition, notwithstanding that some of his specific judgments on live contemporary controversies have themselves drawn discussion from other scholars.
Notes
Scholarly survey of the interpretation, contestation and use of hadith in Islamic thought.
Citation
Author
Jonathan A. C. Brown
Publisher
Oneworld
Publication Year
2014
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Muhammad, Figures

This source names Muhammad directly: "Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad is a scholarly work aimed at a broad educated"

Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Practices, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.