Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Monk, Householder, and Tantric Priest: Newar Buddhism and Its Hierarchy of Ritual

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

David N. Gellner is an anthropologist, and this Cambridge University Press book is his scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists, examining how monastic, householder and tantric priestly roles are organized within this distinctive Buddhist tradition of the Kathmandu Valley. Its strength is that Gellner combines textual and ethnographic method to document a ritual hierarchy that differs substantially from the monastic-only model often assumed to be standard Buddhism, correcting that assumption with direct evidence. Its limit is that it centers on Newar Buddhism specifically, so a claim generalizing to Tibetan or Theravada monastic and priestly structures needs a source addressing those separate traditions.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Cambridge University Press as David N. Gellner's scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's ritual hierarchy, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
David Gellner's scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists.
Citation
Author
David N. Gellner
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1992
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Kathmandu, Cities

This source names Kathmandu directly: "distinctive Buddhist tradition of the Kathmandu Valley."

Newar, Cultures

This source names Newar directly: "Press book is his scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists, examining how monastic, householder and tantric priestly roles are organized within this distinctive Buddhist..."

This source names Theravada directly: "so a claim generalizing to Tibetan or Theravada monastic and priestly structures needs a source addressing those separate traditions."

Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)

This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Cultures, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Cities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.